"content clause" meaning in English

See content clause in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Noun

Forms: content clauses [plural]
Head templates: {{en-noun}} content clause (plural content clauses)
  1. (grammar) A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always). Hypernyms: subordinate clause, dependent clause, embedded clause, <, clause Coordinate_terms: adverbial clause, relative clause
    Sense id: en-content_clause-en-noun-d0Eiahrq Categories (other): English entries with incorrect language header, Pages with 1 entry, Pages with entries, Grammar Topics: grammar, human-sciences, linguistics, sciences

Inflected forms

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "content clauses",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "content clause (plural content clauses)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Grammar",
          "orig": "en:Grammar",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "coordinate_terms": [
        {
          "word": "adverbial clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "relative clause"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "Near-synonyms: nominal clause, noun clause"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              200,
              215
            ],
            [
              329,
              344
            ],
            [
              386,
              401
            ],
            [
              563,
              577
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2024, Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Truth About English Grammar, Polity Press, →ISBN, page 91:",
          "text": "The bracketed parts [of the examples given] are like main clauses in some ways, but not in every way: that vaccines work would not be allowed as a main clause; nor would I ever saw it. I’ll call them content clauses from now on, because they express full sentence-like content of their own. […] Traditional grammars tend to call content clauses “noun clauses” because of a feeling that content clauses can serve as subjects and objects of verbs, just like nouns (by which they mean NPs [noun phrases]). It’s not a good parallel (verbs like Think and Inquire take content-clause complements but not NP complements), and I won’t be using the term “noun clause” in this book.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "hypernyms": [
        {
          "word": "subordinate clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "dependent clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "embedded clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "<"
        },
        {
          "word": "clause"
        }
      ],
      "id": "en-content_clause-en-noun-d0Eiahrq",
      "links": [
        [
          "grammar",
          "grammar"
        ],
        [
          "subordinate clause",
          "subordinate clause"
        ],
        [
          "noun phrase",
          "noun phrase"
        ],
        [
          "main clause",
          "main clause"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(grammar) A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "grammar",
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "content clause"
}
{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "content clauses",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "content clause (plural content clauses)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Grammar"
      ],
      "coordinate_terms": [
        {
          "word": "adverbial clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "relative clause"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "Near-synonyms: nominal clause, noun clause"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              200,
              215
            ],
            [
              329,
              344
            ],
            [
              386,
              401
            ],
            [
              563,
              577
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2024, Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Truth About English Grammar, Polity Press, →ISBN, page 91:",
          "text": "The bracketed parts [of the examples given] are like main clauses in some ways, but not in every way: that vaccines work would not be allowed as a main clause; nor would I ever saw it. I’ll call them content clauses from now on, because they express full sentence-like content of their own. […] Traditional grammars tend to call content clauses “noun clauses” because of a feeling that content clauses can serve as subjects and objects of verbs, just like nouns (by which they mean NPs [noun phrases]). It’s not a good parallel (verbs like Think and Inquire take content-clause complements but not NP complements), and I won’t be using the term “noun clause” in this book.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "hypernyms": [
        {
          "word": "subordinate clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "dependent clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "embedded clause"
        },
        {
          "word": "<"
        },
        {
          "word": "clause"
        }
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "grammar",
          "grammar"
        ],
        [
          "subordinate clause",
          "subordinate clause"
        ],
        [
          "noun phrase",
          "noun phrase"
        ],
        [
          "main clause",
          "main clause"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(grammar) A subordinate clause that expresses a full sentence's worth of meaning by itself and often functions like a noun phrase within a main clause (for example, often like a subject or object, but not always)."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "grammar",
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "content clause"
}

Download raw JSONL data for content clause meaning in English (2.3kB)


This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2025-07-20 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2025-07-01 using wiktextract (45c4a21 and f1c2b61). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.