"artificial language" meaning in 英语

{
  "categories": [
    {
      "kind": "other",
      "name": "有1個詞條的頁面",
      "parents": [],
      "source": "w"
    },
    {
      "kind": "other",
      "name": "英語 人造語言",
      "parents": [],
      "source": "w"
    },
    {
      "kind": "other",
      "name": "英語 語言學",
      "parents": [],
      "source": "w"
    },
    {
      "kind": "other",
      "name": "英語可數名詞",
      "parents": [],
      "source": "w"
    },
    {
      "kind": "other",
      "name": "英語名詞",
      "parents": [],
      "source": "w"
    },
    {
      "kind": "other",
      "name": "英語詞元",
      "parents": [],
      "source": "w"
    }
  ],
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "artificial languages",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lang": "英语",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "glosses": [
        "人造语言，人工语言"
      ],
      "id": "zh-artificial_language-en-noun-dHv6EqWK"
    },
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "有引文的英語詞",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "英語引文翻譯請求",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2001, Mark Sainsbury, 章號 1, 出自 Logical Forms — An Introduction to Philosophical Logic, 2nd版, Blackwell Publishing, →ISBN, §12，頁號 48:",
          "text": "It is theoretically possible that structural ambiguity could be filtered out of natural languages. In (3)-(8) unambiguous paraphrases in English were given; perhaps structurally unambiguous paraphrases in English are always available. But it is unclear whether precise rules could be given which would effect this filtering. One can see why logicians might prefer artificial languages: they are constructed from the ground up in such a way that structural ambiguity is impossible."
        },
        {
          "ref": "ibid., page 52",
          "text": "The question remains open whether such a result could be achieved merely by tinkering with a natural language, or whether it requires starting from scratch. The idea of starting from scratch, constructing an artificial language constrained only by the demands of logic, has inspired a philosophical tradition (though one whose merits are nowadays being questioned). Russell, for example, coined the expression \"philosophical logic\" to represent his view that the workings of natural language, and of our thought, could be adequately represented only by an artificial language, the language of his Principia Mathematica."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "形式语言"
      ],
      "id": "zh-artificial_language-en-noun-vFrWBFIF"
    },
    {
      "glosses": [
        "计算机语言"
      ],
      "id": "zh-artificial_language-en-noun-~yxY9IZ0"
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "sense": "人造语言，人工语言",
      "word": "constructed language"
    },
    {
      "sense": "形式语言",
      "word": "formal language"
    },
    {
      "sense": "计算机语言",
      "word": "computer language"
    }
  ],
  "word": "artificial language"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "有1個詞條的頁面",
    "英語 人造語言",
    "英語 語言學",
    "英語可數名詞",
    "英語名詞",
    "英語詞元"
  ],
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "artificial languages",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lang": "英语",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "glosses": [
        "人造语言，人工语言"
      ]
    },
    {
      "categories": [
        "有引文的英語詞",
        "英語引文翻譯請求"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2001, Mark Sainsbury, 章號 1, 出自 Logical Forms — An Introduction to Philosophical Logic, 2nd版, Blackwell Publishing, →ISBN, §12，頁號 48:",
          "text": "It is theoretically possible that structural ambiguity could be filtered out of natural languages. In (3)-(8) unambiguous paraphrases in English were given; perhaps structurally unambiguous paraphrases in English are always available. But it is unclear whether precise rules could be given which would effect this filtering. One can see why logicians might prefer artificial languages: they are constructed from the ground up in such a way that structural ambiguity is impossible."
        },
        {
          "ref": "ibid., page 52",
          "text": "The question remains open whether such a result could be achieved merely by tinkering with a natural language, or whether it requires starting from scratch. The idea of starting from scratch, constructing an artificial language constrained only by the demands of logic, has inspired a philosophical tradition (though one whose merits are nowadays being questioned). Russell, for example, coined the expression \"philosophical logic\" to represent his view that the workings of natural language, and of our thought, could be adequately represented only by an artificial language, the language of his Principia Mathematica."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "形式语言"
      ]
    },
    {
      "glosses": [
        "计算机语言"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "sense": "人造语言，人工语言",
      "word": "constructed language"
    },
    {
      "sense": "形式语言",
      "word": "formal language"
    },
    {
      "sense": "计算机语言",
      "word": "computer language"
    }
  ],
  "word": "artificial language"
}