"templatic" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "template",
        "3": "-ic"
      },
      "expansion": "template + -ic",
      "name": "af"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From template + -ic.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "templatic (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ic",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Linguistics",
          "orig": "en:Linguistics",
          "parents": [
            "Language",
            "Social sciences",
            "Communication",
            "Sciences",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2003, Robert R. Ratcliffe, “Towards a Universal Theory of Shape-invariant (Templatic) Morphology: Classical Arabic Re-considered”, in Explorations in Seamless Morphology, page 260",
          "text": "In templatic morphology regularity consists in the fact that derived words associated with a particular function show a consistent syllabic (sometimes also vocalic) pattern regardless of the phonological form of the source from which they are derived.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2007, Matti Miestamo, Bernhard Wälchli, New Challenges in Typology",
          "text": "Stipulation of the order of segments in a morpheme is considered \"normal\" and, therefore, not templatic. Similarly, admitting the existence of a grammatical category like \"affix\" or \"clitic\" entails that elements belonging to such categories must have some specification for their linear realization with respect to a host - \"before\" or \"after\" are, intuitively, quite natural types of linear stipulation for such elements, and therefore, also not considered templatic.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2015, Matthew Baerman, The Oxford Handbook of Inflection, page 57",
          "text": "Obviously, adding phonological material is a kind of phonological operation/transformation, whereas templatic morphology typically involves the application of different transformations in different contexts to ensure that the form conforms to a templatic shape.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Restricted to fit into a specific, limited pattern of possible structures or shapes, rather than resulting from the application of a simple generative rule."
      ],
      "id": "en-templatic-en-adj-m4SngIGR",
      "links": [
        [
          "linguistics",
          "linguistics"
        ],
        [
          "Restricted",
          "restrict"
        ],
        [
          "pattern",
          "pattern"
        ],
        [
          "structure",
          "structure"
        ],
        [
          "shape",
          "shape"
        ],
        [
          "simple",
          "simple"
        ],
        [
          "generative",
          "generative"
        ],
        [
          "rule",
          "rule"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(linguistics) Restricted to fit into a specific, limited pattern of possible structures or shapes, rather than resulting from the application of a simple generative rule."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "templatic"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "template",
        "3": "-ic"
      },
      "expansion": "template + -ic",
      "name": "af"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From template + -ic.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "templatic (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -ic",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "en:Linguistics"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2003, Robert R. Ratcliffe, “Towards a Universal Theory of Shape-invariant (Templatic) Morphology: Classical Arabic Re-considered”, in Explorations in Seamless Morphology, page 260",
          "text": "In templatic morphology regularity consists in the fact that derived words associated with a particular function show a consistent syllabic (sometimes also vocalic) pattern regardless of the phonological form of the source from which they are derived.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2007, Matti Miestamo, Bernhard Wälchli, New Challenges in Typology",
          "text": "Stipulation of the order of segments in a morpheme is considered \"normal\" and, therefore, not templatic. Similarly, admitting the existence of a grammatical category like \"affix\" or \"clitic\" entails that elements belonging to such categories must have some specification for their linear realization with respect to a host - \"before\" or \"after\" are, intuitively, quite natural types of linear stipulation for such elements, and therefore, also not considered templatic.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2015, Matthew Baerman, The Oxford Handbook of Inflection, page 57",
          "text": "Obviously, adding phonological material is a kind of phonological operation/transformation, whereas templatic morphology typically involves the application of different transformations in different contexts to ensure that the form conforms to a templatic shape.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Restricted to fit into a specific, limited pattern of possible structures or shapes, rather than resulting from the application of a simple generative rule."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "linguistics",
          "linguistics"
        ],
        [
          "Restricted",
          "restrict"
        ],
        [
          "pattern",
          "pattern"
        ],
        [
          "structure",
          "structure"
        ],
        [
          "shape",
          "shape"
        ],
        [
          "simple",
          "simple"
        ],
        [
          "generative",
          "generative"
        ],
        [
          "rule",
          "rule"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(linguistics) Restricted to fit into a specific, limited pattern of possible structures or shapes, rather than resulting from the application of a simple generative rule."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "templatic"
}