See prejacent in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
{
"derived": [
{
"_dis1": "0 0 0",
"word": "prejacently"
}
],
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "frm",
"3": "prejacent",
"gloss": "previously existing"
},
"expansion": "Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”)",
"name": "bor"
},
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "la",
"3": "praeiacens",
"gloss": "situated before"
},
"expansion": "Latin praeiacens (“situated before”)",
"name": "der"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Multiple origins. Borrowed from Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”) during the sixteenth century. Also attested in twelfth century British sources, from post-classical Latin praeiacens (“situated before”).",
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "?"
},
"expansion": "prejacent",
"name": "en-adj"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "adj",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
100,
109
]
],
"ref": "1631, William Twisse, A Discovery of D. Jacksons Vanitie, page 45:",
"text": "The Platonickes and Stoicks acknowledged a divine understandinge to have made the world, but out of prejacent matter, which they conccaved to be eternall, and to acknowledge no maker.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
66,
75
]
],
"ref": "1999, Philip Lyndon Reynolds, Food and the Body: Some Peculiar Questions in High Medieval Theology, page 406:",
"text": "Again, to be created from nothing is not to have been formed from prejacent matter (although in another sense, the newly created body is made from matter).",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Existing previously, preexistent."
],
"id": "en-prejacent-en-adj-qVF5rEWo",
"links": [
[
"previously",
"previously"
],
[
"preexistent",
"preexistent"
]
]
},
{
"categories": [],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
145,
154
]
],
"ref": "1991, Myron Spain, The Production of Human Speech, page 166:",
"text": "Like the vowels, if you pronounce a given consonant farther backward or forward than the location per the chart, then you probably pronounce its prejacent chart neighbor ahead of that location and its postjacent chart neighbor further back",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Before; situated in front."
],
"id": "en-prejacent-en-adj-sUq84soA",
"links": [
[
"Before",
"before"
],
[
"front",
"front"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(archaic, now rare) Before; situated in front."
],
"tags": [
"archaic"
]
},
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Logic",
"orig": "en:Logic",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"_dis": "2 3 45 35 15",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
"parents": [],
"source": "w+disamb"
},
{
"_dis": "11 9 40 29 11",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
"parents": [],
"source": "w+disamb"
},
{
"_dis": "2 2 49 37 10",
"kind": "other",
"name": "Pages with 1 entry",
"parents": [],
"source": "w+disamb"
},
{
"_dis": "1 2 49 35 12",
"kind": "other",
"name": "Pages with entries",
"parents": [],
"source": "w+disamb"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
68,
77
]
],
"ref": "2013, John Gajewski, “An analogy between a connected exceptive phrase and polarity items”, in Eva Csipak, Regine Eckardt, Mingya Liu, editors, Beyond ‘Any’ and ‘Ever’: New Explorations in Negative Polarity, page 196:",
"text": "So, every exception set S that is not a subset of C(={b}) makes the prejacent statement false, i.e. makes it so that some (NPᵂ–S) (VPᵂ)=0.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Laid out earlier, prior."
],
"id": "en-prejacent-en-adj-4c3Ft~AV",
"links": [
[
"logic",
"logic"
],
[
"earlier",
"earlier"
],
[
"prior",
"prior"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(logic, of a proposition) Laid out earlier, prior."
],
"raw_tags": [
"of a proposition"
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"logic",
"mathematics",
"philosophy",
"sciences"
]
}
],
"word": "prejacent"
}
{
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "frm",
"3": "prejacent",
"gloss": "previously existing"
},
"expansion": "Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”)",
"name": "bor"
},
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "la",
"3": "praeiacens",
"gloss": "situated before"
},
"expansion": "Latin praeiacens (“situated before”)",
"name": "der"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Multiple origins. Borrowed from Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”) during the sixteenth century. Also attested in twelfth century British sources, from post-classical Latin praeiacens (“situated before”).",
"forms": [
{
"form": "prejacents",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "prejacent (plural prejacents)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Linguistics",
"orig": "en:Linguistics",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Logic",
"orig": "en:Logic",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Philosophy",
"orig": "en:Philosophy",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
19,
28
],
[
111,
120
]
],
"ref": "1979 [c. 1499], Norman Kretzman, Logica Magna, translation of original by Pauli Veneti, pages 27–29:",
"text": "The subject of the prejacent and its exclusive must be one and the same (I grant that), but the subject of the prejacent ‘every man is a man’ is just ‘man’",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"A proposition laid out previously; a proposition from which another proposition is inferred."
],
"id": "en-prejacent-en-noun-NtcybINX",
"links": [
[
"philosophy",
"philosophy"
],
[
"logic",
"logic"
],
[
"linguistics",
"linguistics"
],
[
"proposition",
"proposition"
],
[
"previously",
"previously"
],
[
"infer",
"infer"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(philosophy, logic, linguistics) A proposition laid out previously; a proposition from which another proposition is inferred."
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"linguistics",
"logic",
"mathematics",
"philosophy",
"sciences"
]
},
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Linguistics",
"orig": "en:Linguistics",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Semantics",
"orig": "en:Semantics",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
154,
163
]
],
"ref": "1997, Laurence Horn, “Negative polarity and the dynamics of vertical inference”, in Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau, María Luisa Rivero, editors, Negation and Polarity, page 176:",
"text": "I have suggested elsewhere (Horn 1992: 182-83) that this case requires an invocation of the notion of explicature or pragmatic enrichment […] so that the prejacent, while not constituting part of the linguistic meaning contributed by only, enters into the determination of what is said and hence into the enriched propositional content.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
89,
98
],
[
197,
206
],
[
259,
268
]
],
"ref": "2016, Lisa Matthewson, “Modality”, in Maria Aloni, Paul Dekker, editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, →DOI, →ISBN, page 539:",
"text": "The factual modal k’a requires the speaker to have indirect inferential evidence for the prejacent, while the content modal lákw7a requires the speaker to have sensory, non-visual evidence for the prejacent. Only lákw7a allows the speaker to believe that the prejacent is false.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"The propositional content with which a scope-taking operator (such as a modal, a focus particle like only, or an exhaustivity operator) combines."
],
"id": "en-prejacent-en-noun-zffYezrF",
"links": [
[
"linguistics",
"linguistics"
],
[
"semantics",
"semantics"
],
[
"scope",
"scope"
],
[
"operator",
"operator"
],
[
"modal",
"modal"
],
[
"focus",
"focus"
],
[
"exhaustivity",
"exhaustivity"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(linguistics, semantics) The propositional content with which a scope-taking operator (such as a modal, a focus particle like only, or an exhaustivity operator) combines."
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"linguistics",
"sciences",
"semantics"
]
}
],
"word": "prejacent"
}
{
"categories": [
"English adjectives",
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English lemmas",
"English nouns",
"English terms borrowed from Middle French",
"English terms derived from Latin",
"English terms derived from Middle French",
"English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
"Pages with 1 entry",
"Pages with entries"
],
"derived": [
{
"word": "prejacently"
}
],
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "frm",
"3": "prejacent",
"gloss": "previously existing"
},
"expansion": "Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”)",
"name": "bor"
},
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "la",
"3": "praeiacens",
"gloss": "situated before"
},
"expansion": "Latin praeiacens (“situated before”)",
"name": "der"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Multiple origins. Borrowed from Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”) during the sixteenth century. Also attested in twelfth century British sources, from post-classical Latin praeiacens (“situated before”).",
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "?"
},
"expansion": "prejacent",
"name": "en-adj"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "adj",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations"
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
100,
109
]
],
"ref": "1631, William Twisse, A Discovery of D. Jacksons Vanitie, page 45:",
"text": "The Platonickes and Stoicks acknowledged a divine understandinge to have made the world, but out of prejacent matter, which they conccaved to be eternall, and to acknowledge no maker.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
66,
75
]
],
"ref": "1999, Philip Lyndon Reynolds, Food and the Body: Some Peculiar Questions in High Medieval Theology, page 406:",
"text": "Again, to be created from nothing is not to have been formed from prejacent matter (although in another sense, the newly created body is made from matter).",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Existing previously, preexistent."
],
"links": [
[
"previously",
"previously"
],
[
"preexistent",
"preexistent"
]
]
},
{
"categories": [
"English terms with archaic senses",
"English terms with quotations",
"English terms with rare senses"
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
145,
154
]
],
"ref": "1991, Myron Spain, The Production of Human Speech, page 166:",
"text": "Like the vowels, if you pronounce a given consonant farther backward or forward than the location per the chart, then you probably pronounce its prejacent chart neighbor ahead of that location and its postjacent chart neighbor further back",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Before; situated in front."
],
"links": [
[
"Before",
"before"
],
[
"front",
"front"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(archaic, now rare) Before; situated in front."
],
"tags": [
"archaic"
]
},
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations",
"en:Logic"
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
68,
77
]
],
"ref": "2013, John Gajewski, “An analogy between a connected exceptive phrase and polarity items”, in Eva Csipak, Regine Eckardt, Mingya Liu, editors, Beyond ‘Any’ and ‘Ever’: New Explorations in Negative Polarity, page 196:",
"text": "So, every exception set S that is not a subset of C(={b}) makes the prejacent statement false, i.e. makes it so that some (NPᵂ–S) (VPᵂ)=0.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Laid out earlier, prior."
],
"links": [
[
"logic",
"logic"
],
[
"earlier",
"earlier"
],
[
"prior",
"prior"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(logic, of a proposition) Laid out earlier, prior."
],
"raw_tags": [
"of a proposition"
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"logic",
"mathematics",
"philosophy",
"sciences"
]
}
],
"word": "prejacent"
}
{
"categories": [
"English adjectives",
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English lemmas",
"English nouns",
"English terms borrowed from Middle French",
"English terms derived from Latin",
"English terms derived from Middle French",
"English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
"Pages with 1 entry",
"Pages with entries"
],
"etymology_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "frm",
"3": "prejacent",
"gloss": "previously existing"
},
"expansion": "Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”)",
"name": "bor"
},
{
"args": {
"1": "en",
"2": "la",
"3": "praeiacens",
"gloss": "situated before"
},
"expansion": "Latin praeiacens (“situated before”)",
"name": "der"
}
],
"etymology_text": "Multiple origins. Borrowed from Middle French prejacent (“previously existing”) during the sixteenth century. Also attested in twelfth century British sources, from post-classical Latin praeiacens (“situated before”).",
"forms": [
{
"form": "prejacents",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "prejacent (plural prejacents)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations",
"en:Linguistics",
"en:Logic",
"en:Philosophy"
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
19,
28
],
[
111,
120
]
],
"ref": "1979 [c. 1499], Norman Kretzman, Logica Magna, translation of original by Pauli Veneti, pages 27–29:",
"text": "The subject of the prejacent and its exclusive must be one and the same (I grant that), but the subject of the prejacent ‘every man is a man’ is just ‘man’",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"A proposition laid out previously; a proposition from which another proposition is inferred."
],
"links": [
[
"philosophy",
"philosophy"
],
[
"logic",
"logic"
],
[
"linguistics",
"linguistics"
],
[
"proposition",
"proposition"
],
[
"previously",
"previously"
],
[
"infer",
"infer"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(philosophy, logic, linguistics) A proposition laid out previously; a proposition from which another proposition is inferred."
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"linguistics",
"logic",
"mathematics",
"philosophy",
"sciences"
]
},
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations",
"en:Linguistics",
"en:Semantics"
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
154,
163
]
],
"ref": "1997, Laurence Horn, “Negative polarity and the dynamics of vertical inference”, in Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau, María Luisa Rivero, editors, Negation and Polarity, page 176:",
"text": "I have suggested elsewhere (Horn 1992: 182-83) that this case requires an invocation of the notion of explicature or pragmatic enrichment […] so that the prejacent, while not constituting part of the linguistic meaning contributed by only, enters into the determination of what is said and hence into the enriched propositional content.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
89,
98
],
[
197,
206
],
[
259,
268
]
],
"ref": "2016, Lisa Matthewson, “Modality”, in Maria Aloni, Paul Dekker, editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, →DOI, →ISBN, page 539:",
"text": "The factual modal k’a requires the speaker to have indirect inferential evidence for the prejacent, while the content modal lákw7a requires the speaker to have sensory, non-visual evidence for the prejacent. Only lákw7a allows the speaker to believe that the prejacent is false.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"The propositional content with which a scope-taking operator (such as a modal, a focus particle like only, or an exhaustivity operator) combines."
],
"links": [
[
"linguistics",
"linguistics"
],
[
"semantics",
"semantics"
],
[
"scope",
"scope"
],
[
"operator",
"operator"
],
[
"modal",
"modal"
],
[
"focus",
"focus"
],
[
"exhaustivity",
"exhaustivity"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(linguistics, semantics) The propositional content with which a scope-taking operator (such as a modal, a focus particle like only, or an exhaustivity operator) combines."
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"linguistics",
"sciences",
"semantics"
]
}
],
"word": "prejacent"
}
Download raw JSONL data for prejacent meaning in English (7.6kB)
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2026-09-16 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2026-09-02 using wiktextract (d6fca27 and 65e1673). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.