Münchhausen trilemma in English

[Show JSON for postprocessed kaikki.org data shown on this page ▼] [Hide JSON for postprocessed kaikki.org data shown on this page ▲]

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Münchhausen trilemma",
      "name": "en-proper noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "name",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Philosophy",
          "orig": "en:Philosophy",
          "parents": [
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The problem in epistemology that all three ways of providing a proof — circular argument, regressive argument, and axiomatic argument — may be regarded as unsatisfactory."
      ],
      "id": "en-Münchhausen_trilemma-en-name-4nT~yvDE",
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "problem",
          "problem"
        ],
        [
          "epistemology",
          "epistemology"
        ],
        [
          "proof",
          "proof"
        ],
        [
          "circular",
          "circular"
        ],
        [
          "argument",
          "argument"
        ],
        [
          "regressive",
          "regressive"
        ],
        [
          "axiomatic",
          "axiomatic"
        ],
        [
          "unsatisfactory",
          "unsatisfactory"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) The problem in epistemology that all three ways of providing a proof — circular argument, regressive argument, and axiomatic argument — may be regarded as unsatisfactory."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "Agrippa's trilemma"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "Münchhausen trilemma"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Münchhausen trilemma"
}

[Show JSON for raw wiktextract data ▼] [Hide JSON for raw wiktextract data ▲]

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Münchhausen trilemma",
      "name": "en-proper noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "name",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English eponyms",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English proper nouns",
        "English terms spelled with Ü",
        "English terms spelled with ◌̈",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Philosophy"
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The problem in epistemology that all three ways of providing a proof — circular argument, regressive argument, and axiomatic argument — may be regarded as unsatisfactory."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "problem",
          "problem"
        ],
        [
          "epistemology",
          "epistemology"
        ],
        [
          "proof",
          "proof"
        ],
        [
          "circular",
          "circular"
        ],
        [
          "argument",
          "argument"
        ],
        [
          "regressive",
          "regressive"
        ],
        [
          "axiomatic",
          "axiomatic"
        ],
        [
          "unsatisfactory",
          "unsatisfactory"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) The problem in epistemology that all three ways of providing a proof — circular argument, regressive argument, and axiomatic argument — may be regarded as unsatisfactory."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "Münchhausen trilemma"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "Agrippa's trilemma"
    }
  ],
  "word": "Münchhausen trilemma"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-12-21 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-12-04 using wiktextract (d8cb2f3 and 4e554ae). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.

"Münchhausen trilemma" meaning in English

Proper name