"nowhen" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "no",
        "3": "when"
      },
      "expansion": "no + when",
      "name": "compound"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From no + when, by analogy with nowhere. See quotation from 1996.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nowhen (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Philosophy",
          "orig": "en:Philosophy",
          "parents": [
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "54 46",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "46 54",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996, Huw Price, Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point, Oxford University Press:",
          "text": "I want to show that if we want to understand the asymmetry of time then we need to be able to understand, and quarantine, the various ways in which our patterns of thought reflect the peculiarities of our own temporal perspective. We need to acquaint ourselves with what might aptly be called the view from nowhen.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A point from which one has an unrestricted perspective in time."
      ],
      "id": "en-nowhen-en-noun-gza5NHf6",
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) A point from which one has an unrestricted perspective in time."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nowhen"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "no",
        "3": "when"
      },
      "expansion": "no + when",
      "name": "compound"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From no + when, by analogy with nowhere. See quotation from 1996.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nowhen (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adv"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "_dis": "54 46",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "46 54",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1915, Clement Charles Julian Webb, Studies in the History of Natural Theology, page 186:",
          "text": "Again, whatever is not here nor there, now nor then, is capable of being nowhen or nowhere; and so all things which consist of parts, though they may exist always (like Time) or everywhere (like the Universe),[…]",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2017 October 3, Albert Peter Pacelli, Being and Intelligibility, Wipf and Stock Publishers, →ISBN, page 220:",
          "text": "Do they have continuous existence, nowhere and nowhen, or are they created as needed by categorial reason? On what ground can we postulate them in order to define truth? If they merely copy the world why do we need them and how do we[…]",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "In or at no (point in) time."
      ],
      "id": "en-nowhen-en-adv-8Y7YWTHS",
      "links": [
        [
          "In",
          "in"
        ],
        [
          "at",
          "at"
        ],
        [
          "no",
          "no"
        ],
        [
          "time",
          "time"
        ]
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "nowhen else"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nowhen"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "English adverbs",
    "English compound terms",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English uncomparable adverbs",
    "English uncountable nouns",
    "Pages with 1 entry"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "no",
        "3": "when"
      },
      "expansion": "no + when",
      "name": "compound"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From no + when, by analogy with nowhere. See quotation from 1996.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nowhen (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Quotation templates to be cleaned",
        "en:Philosophy"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996, Huw Price, Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point, Oxford University Press:",
          "text": "I want to show that if we want to understand the asymmetry of time then we need to be able to understand, and quarantine, the various ways in which our patterns of thought reflect the peculiarities of our own temporal perspective. We need to acquaint ourselves with what might aptly be called the view from nowhen.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A point from which one has an unrestricted perspective in time."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) A point from which one has an unrestricted perspective in time."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nowhen"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "English adverbs",
    "English compound terms",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English uncomparable adverbs",
    "English uncountable nouns",
    "Pages with 1 entry"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "no",
        "3": "when"
      },
      "expansion": "no + when",
      "name": "compound"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From no + when, by analogy with nowhere. See quotation from 1996.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nowhen (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adv"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adv",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "nowhen else"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English terms with quotations"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1915, Clement Charles Julian Webb, Studies in the History of Natural Theology, page 186:",
          "text": "Again, whatever is not here nor there, now nor then, is capable of being nowhen or nowhere; and so all things which consist of parts, though they may exist always (like Time) or everywhere (like the Universe),[…]",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2017 October 3, Albert Peter Pacelli, Being and Intelligibility, Wipf and Stock Publishers, →ISBN, page 220:",
          "text": "Do they have continuous existence, nowhere and nowhen, or are they created as needed by categorial reason? On what ground can we postulate them in order to define truth? If they merely copy the world why do we need them and how do we[…]",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "In or at no (point in) time."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "In",
          "in"
        ],
        [
          "at",
          "at"
        ],
        [
          "no",
          "no"
        ],
        [
          "time",
          "time"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nowhen"
}