"nominalistic" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "nominalist",
        "3": "ic"
      },
      "expansion": "nominalist + -ic",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From nominalist + -ic.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more nominalistic",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most nominalistic",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "nominalistic (comparative more nominalistic, superlative most nominalistic)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ic",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Philosophy",
          "orig": "en:Philosophy",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              179,
              191
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2008 April 1, Ross P. Cameron, “Truthmakers and ontological commitment: or how to deal with complex objects and mathematical ontology without getting into”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 140, number 1, →DOI:",
          "text": "The debate over whether or not there are sets, or numbers, or other abstracta, shouldn’t be pursued by trying to work out whether talk of such things is paraphrasable away into a nominalistic language[…].",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Having a nominalist character"
      ],
      "id": "en-nominalistic-en-adj-SZurbZod",
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "nominalist",
          "nominalist"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) Having a nominalist character"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nominalistic"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "nominalist",
        "3": "ic"
      },
      "expansion": "nominalist + -ic",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From nominalist + -ic.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more nominalistic",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most nominalistic",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "nominalistic (comparative more nominalistic, superlative most nominalistic)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -ic",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Philosophy"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              179,
              191
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2008 April 1, Ross P. Cameron, “Truthmakers and ontological commitment: or how to deal with complex objects and mathematical ontology without getting into”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 140, number 1, →DOI:",
          "text": "The debate over whether or not there are sets, or numbers, or other abstracta, shouldn’t be pursued by trying to work out whether talk of such things is paraphrasable away into a nominalistic language[…].",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Having a nominalist character"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "nominalist",
          "nominalist"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) Having a nominalist character"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nominalistic"
}