"mysterianism" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "mysterianism (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Philosophy",
          "orig": "en:Philosophy",
          "parents": [
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "derived": [
        {
          "word": "new mysterianism"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2007 August 9, Neal Judisch, “Why ‘non-mental’ won’t work: on Hempel’s dilemma and the characterization of the ‘physical’”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 140, number 3, →DOI:",
          "text": "The latter contention may be motivated in one of two ways: either by appeal to positively characterized and seemingly conflictive features of the mental and the physical (in which case we might always reject dualism in favor of a materialist mysterianism such as McGinn’s 1999 ), or simply by failing to characterize positively the relevant domain of non-mental entities with which mentality is in need of reconciliation.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The view that the explanation of consciousness is not possible by humans"
      ],
      "id": "en-mysterianism-en-noun-tvR2r9w6",
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "consciousness",
          "consciousness"
        ],
        [
          "human",
          "human"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) The view that the explanation of consciousness is not possible by humans"
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "mysterianist"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "mysterianism"
}

{
  "derived": [
    {
      "word": "new mysterianism"
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "mysterianism (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "mysterianist"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Philosophy"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2007 August 9, Neal Judisch, “Why ‘non-mental’ won’t work: on Hempel’s dilemma and the characterization of the ‘physical’”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 140, number 3, →DOI:",
          "text": "The latter contention may be motivated in one of two ways: either by appeal to positively characterized and seemingly conflictive features of the mental and the physical (in which case we might always reject dualism in favor of a materialist mysterianism such as McGinn’s 1999 ), or simply by failing to characterize positively the relevant domain of non-mental entities with which mentality is in need of reconciliation.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The view that the explanation of consciousness is not possible by humans"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "consciousness",
          "consciousness"
        ],
        [
          "human",
          "human"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) The view that the explanation of consciousness is not possible by humans"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "mysterianism"
}