"sethood" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "set",
        "3": "hood"
      },
      "expansion": "set + -hood",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From set + -hood.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "sethood (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -hood",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Mathematics",
          "orig": "en:Mathematics",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Set theory",
          "orig": "en:Set theory",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "William Van Ormen Quine (1969) Set Theory and Its Logic, →ISBN, page 302: “In the first edition I relativized the sethood condition insufficiently, failing to restrict the bound variables to sets”"
        },
        {
          "text": "John Bigelow and Robert Pargetter (1990) Science and Necessity, →ISBN, page 368: “In fact, this can be used as a necessary condition for sethood: a universal is a set only if any given thing instantiates it either in all possible worlds or in none.”"
        },
        {
          "text": "Yiannis N. Moschovakis (2006) Notes on Set Theory, →ISBN, page 111: “Each of (II)–(VI) grants sethood to a specific, explicitly defined collection of objects, it legitimizes a special case of the most appealing (if false) General Comprehension Principle 3.3.”"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The state of being a set."
      ],
      "id": "en-sethood-en-noun-aMNyvQDe",
      "links": [
        [
          "mathematics",
          "mathematics"
        ],
        [
          "set",
          "set"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(mathematics) The state of being a set."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "mathematics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "sethood"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "set",
        "3": "hood"
      },
      "expansion": "set + -hood",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From set + -hood.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "sethood (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms suffixed with -hood",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Mathematics",
        "en:Set theory"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "William Van Ormen Quine (1969) Set Theory and Its Logic, →ISBN, page 302: “In the first edition I relativized the sethood condition insufficiently, failing to restrict the bound variables to sets”"
        },
        {
          "text": "John Bigelow and Robert Pargetter (1990) Science and Necessity, →ISBN, page 368: “In fact, this can be used as a necessary condition for sethood: a universal is a set only if any given thing instantiates it either in all possible worlds or in none.”"
        },
        {
          "text": "Yiannis N. Moschovakis (2006) Notes on Set Theory, →ISBN, page 111: “Each of (II)–(VI) grants sethood to a specific, explicitly defined collection of objects, it legitimizes a special case of the most appealing (if false) General Comprehension Principle 3.3.”"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The state of being a set."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "mathematics",
          "mathematics"
        ],
        [
          "set",
          "set"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(mathematics) The state of being a set."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "mathematics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "sethood"
}