"sensu strictissimo" meaning in English

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "adverb",
        "head": "sensu strictissimo"
      },
      "expansion": "sensu strictissimo",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Law",
          "orig": "en:Law",
          "parents": [
            "Justice",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Sciences",
          "orig": "en:Sciences",
          "parents": [
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "1985 Mark E. Villiger: Customary international law and treaties. →ISBN\nThis narrow view of codification sensu strictissimo requires further consideration, since it is perhaps the chief reason why codification, and its delimitation from development, have been discarded as pointless efforts. Thus, we should bear in mind that customary law is, by nature, often general, vague and imprecise. It would therefore prove difficult and undesirable to establish exact written replicas of the customary rule. Professor Jennings has argued that \"the very fact of changing the law from an unwritten source to a written source is in itself inevitably a major change.\""
        }
      ],
      "form_of": [
        {
          "extra": "in the strictest possible sense",
          "word": "sensu stricto"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "superlative or intensive form of sensu stricto: in the strictest possible sense."
      ],
      "id": "en-sensu_strictissimo-en-adv-MiYmZ~Wp",
      "links": [
        [
          "law",
          "law#English"
        ],
        [
          "sciences",
          "sciences"
        ],
        [
          "sensu stricto",
          "sensu stricto#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(law or sciences) superlative or intensive form of sensu stricto: in the strictest possible sense."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "emphatic",
        "form-of",
        "superlative"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "law",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "sensu strictissimo"
}

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "adverb",
        "head": "sensu strictissimo"
      },
      "expansion": "sensu strictissimo",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adv",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adverbs",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Law",
        "en:Sciences"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "1985 Mark E. Villiger: Customary international law and treaties. →ISBN\nThis narrow view of codification sensu strictissimo requires further consideration, since it is perhaps the chief reason why codification, and its delimitation from development, have been discarded as pointless efforts. Thus, we should bear in mind that customary law is, by nature, often general, vague and imprecise. It would therefore prove difficult and undesirable to establish exact written replicas of the customary rule. Professor Jennings has argued that \"the very fact of changing the law from an unwritten source to a written source is in itself inevitably a major change.\""
        }
      ],
      "form_of": [
        {
          "extra": "in the strictest possible sense",
          "word": "sensu stricto"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "superlative or intensive form of sensu stricto: in the strictest possible sense."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "law",
          "law#English"
        ],
        [
          "sciences",
          "sciences"
        ],
        [
          "sensu stricto",
          "sensu stricto#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(law or sciences) superlative or intensive form of sensu stricto: in the strictest possible sense."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "emphatic",
        "form-of",
        "superlative"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "law",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "sensu strictissimo"
}