"reobject" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "re",
        "3": "object"
      },
      "expansion": "re- + object",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From re- + object.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "reobjects",
      "tags": [
        "present",
        "singular",
        "third-person"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "reobjecting",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "present"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "reobjected",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "past"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "reobjected",
      "tags": [
        "past"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "reobject (third-person singular simple present reobjects, present participle reobjecting, simple past and past participle reobjected)",
      "name": "en-verb"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "verb",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with re-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              100,
              108
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "1979, California. Court of Appeal (1st Appellate District). Records and Briefs 4CIV21826, Appellant's Opening, page 7:",
          "text": "The objection of the husband was interposed in timely fashion and there was no legal requirement to reobject or make a motion to strike to avoid waiving error on appeal and therefore it is suggested that the ruling overruling the objection was improper at the time it was made.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "to object again"
      ],
      "id": "en-reobject-en-verb-6-wtb8HI",
      "links": [
        [
          "object",
          "object"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(intransitive) to object again"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "intransitive"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "reobject"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "re",
        "3": "object"
      },
      "expansion": "re- + object",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From re- + object.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "reobjects",
      "tags": [
        "present",
        "singular",
        "third-person"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "reobjecting",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "present"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "reobjected",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "past"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "reobjected",
      "tags": [
        "past"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "reobject (third-person singular simple present reobjects, present participle reobjecting, simple past and past participle reobjected)",
      "name": "en-verb"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "verb",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English intransitive verbs",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with re-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English verbs",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              100,
              108
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "1979, California. Court of Appeal (1st Appellate District). Records and Briefs 4CIV21826, Appellant's Opening, page 7:",
          "text": "The objection of the husband was interposed in timely fashion and there was no legal requirement to reobject or make a motion to strike to avoid waiving error on appeal and therefore it is suggested that the ruling overruling the objection was improper at the time it was made.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "to object again"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "object",
          "object"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(intransitive) to object again"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "intransitive"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "reobject"
}