See p(doom) in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
{
"etymology_text": "Mathematical notation for the probability (p) of an event (more formally written as P(doom)). Originated on the LessWrong message board around 2010, later popularized by Eliezer Yudkowsky and other AI safety researchers.",
"forms": [
{
"form": "p",
"tags": [
"canonical"
]
},
{
"form": "p(doom)s",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
},
{
"form": "doom",
"tags": [
"alternative"
]
},
{
"form": "P(doom)",
"tags": [
"alternative"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "~",
"head": "p(doom)"
},
"expansion": "p(doom) (countable and uncountable, plural p(doom)s)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "other",
"name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "other",
"name": "Pages with 1 entry",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "other",
"name": "Pages with entries",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "other",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Artificial intelligence",
"orig": "en:Artificial intelligence",
"parents": [],
"source": "w"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
3,
10
]
],
"text": "My p(doom) is 15%.",
"type": "example"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
73,
80
]
],
"ref": "2023 December 6, Kevin Roose, “Silicon Valley Confronts a Grim New A.I. Metric”, in The New York Times, →ISSN, archived from the original on 2023-12-07:",
"text": "I’ve been to two tech events this year where a stranger has asked for my p(doom) as casually as if they were asking for directions to the bathroom.",
"type": "quote"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
75,
82
]
],
"ref": "2025, Emily M. Bender, Alex Hanna, “An Introduction to AI Hype”, in The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want^(https://books.google.com/books?id=T3EXEQAAQBAJ&pg=PP9&dq=%22p(doom)%22&hl=&cd=2&source=gbs_api#v=onepage&q=%22p(doom)%22&f=false), Random House, →ISBN:",
"text": "And the cartoonish connotations are apt: just like such fictional battles, p(doom) estimates are based in fantasy rather than data or empirical fact.",
"type": "quote"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
197,
204
]
],
"ref": "2025 June 2, Adrian Horton, “Tech-bro satire Mountainhead is an insufferable disappointment”, in The Guardian, →ISSN:",
"text": "Mountainhead plays out less like a drama between four tenuously connected, very rich friends, and more like a random word generator of tech and finance bro jargon – decel (deceleration, as in AI), p(doom) (the probability of an AI apocalypse), first principles.",
"type": "quote"
}
],
"glosses": [
"The probability of existentially catastrophic outcomes (doom) as a result of misaligned artificial intelligence, especially one's personal estimate for such an outcome, usually given as a percentage value."
],
"id": "en-p(doom)-en-noun-uN~j5woG",
"links": [
[
"artificial intelligence",
"artificial intelligence"
],
[
"humorous",
"humorous"
],
[
"probability",
"probability"
],
[
"doom",
"doom#English"
],
[
"misaligned",
"misaligned"
]
],
"qualifier": "artificial intelligence",
"raw_glosses": [
"(artificial intelligence, originally humorous) The probability of existentially catastrophic outcomes (doom) as a result of misaligned artificial intelligence, especially one's personal estimate for such an outcome, usually given as a percentage value."
],
"related": [
{
"word": "doomer"
},
{
"word": "doomism"
},
{
"word": "doomster"
}
],
"tags": [
"countable",
"uncountable"
],
"wikipedia": [
"Eliezer Yudkowsky",
"LessWrong"
]
}
],
"sounds": [
{
"ipa": "/piː duːm/"
}
],
"word": "p(doom)"
}
{
"etymology_text": "Mathematical notation for the probability (p) of an event (more formally written as P(doom)). Originated on the LessWrong message board around 2010, later popularized by Eliezer Yudkowsky and other AI safety researchers.",
"forms": [
{
"form": "p",
"tags": [
"canonical"
]
},
{
"form": "p(doom)s",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
},
{
"form": "doom",
"tags": [
"alternative"
]
},
{
"form": "P(doom)",
"tags": [
"alternative"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {
"1": "~",
"head": "p(doom)"
},
"expansion": "p(doom) (countable and uncountable, plural p(doom)s)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"related": [
{
"word": "doomer"
},
{
"word": "doomism"
},
{
"word": "doomster"
}
],
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English humorous terms",
"English lemmas",
"English nouns",
"English terms spelled with parentheses",
"English terms with quotations",
"English terms with redundant head parameter",
"English terms with usage examples",
"English uncountable nouns",
"Pages with 1 entry",
"Pages with entries",
"en:Artificial intelligence"
],
"examples": [
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
3,
10
]
],
"text": "My p(doom) is 15%.",
"type": "example"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
73,
80
]
],
"ref": "2023 December 6, Kevin Roose, “Silicon Valley Confronts a Grim New A.I. Metric”, in The New York Times, →ISSN, archived from the original on 2023-12-07:",
"text": "I’ve been to two tech events this year where a stranger has asked for my p(doom) as casually as if they were asking for directions to the bathroom.",
"type": "quote"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
75,
82
]
],
"ref": "2025, Emily M. Bender, Alex Hanna, “An Introduction to AI Hype”, in The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want^(https://books.google.com/books?id=T3EXEQAAQBAJ&pg=PP9&dq=%22p(doom)%22&hl=&cd=2&source=gbs_api#v=onepage&q=%22p(doom)%22&f=false), Random House, →ISBN:",
"text": "And the cartoonish connotations are apt: just like such fictional battles, p(doom) estimates are based in fantasy rather than data or empirical fact.",
"type": "quote"
},
{
"bold_text_offsets": [
[
197,
204
]
],
"ref": "2025 June 2, Adrian Horton, “Tech-bro satire Mountainhead is an insufferable disappointment”, in The Guardian, →ISSN:",
"text": "Mountainhead plays out less like a drama between four tenuously connected, very rich friends, and more like a random word generator of tech and finance bro jargon – decel (deceleration, as in AI), p(doom) (the probability of an AI apocalypse), first principles.",
"type": "quote"
}
],
"glosses": [
"The probability of existentially catastrophic outcomes (doom) as a result of misaligned artificial intelligence, especially one's personal estimate for such an outcome, usually given as a percentage value."
],
"links": [
[
"artificial intelligence",
"artificial intelligence"
],
[
"humorous",
"humorous"
],
[
"probability",
"probability"
],
[
"doom",
"doom#English"
],
[
"misaligned",
"misaligned"
]
],
"qualifier": "artificial intelligence",
"raw_glosses": [
"(artificial intelligence, originally humorous) The probability of existentially catastrophic outcomes (doom) as a result of misaligned artificial intelligence, especially one's personal estimate for such an outcome, usually given as a percentage value."
],
"tags": [
"countable",
"uncountable"
],
"wikipedia": [
"Eliezer Yudkowsky",
"LessWrong"
]
}
],
"sounds": [
{
"ipa": "/piː duːm/"
}
],
"word": "p(doom)"
}
Download raw JSONL data for p(doom) meaning in English (3.4kB)
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2025-07-11 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2025-07-01 using wiktextract (84cf5d0 and f1c2b61). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.