"nature-positive" meaning in English

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more nature-positive",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most nature-positive",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "nature-positive (comparative more nature-positive, superlative most nature-positive)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Ecology",
          "orig": "en:Ecology",
          "parents": [
            "Biology",
            "Sciences",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2021 October 28, Frans Timmermans, Achim Steiner, Sandrine Dixson-Declève, “Net zero is not enough – we need to build a nature-positive future”, in The Guardian",
          "text": "At the same time, the extent of our planetary emergency – of climate crisis, biodiversity loss and inequality – has become evident. As we rebuild our societies and economies, we are faced with a unique opportunity to build a nature-positive future that we must not let slip away.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2022 December 19, Patrick Greenfield, Phoebe Weston, “Cop15: historic deal struck to halt biodiversity loss by 2030”, in The Guardian",
          "text": "Observers expressed disappointment at the weaker-than-hoped-for language on consumption and pesticide use, both significant drivers of biodiversity loss. The term “nature positive”, which some scientists had said would be the biodiversity equivalent of “net zero”, did not appear in the agreement.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "environmentally friendly; supportive of nature."
      ],
      "id": "en-nature-positive-en-adj-jLgaSmKg",
      "links": [
        [
          "ecology",
          "ecology"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(ecology) environmentally friendly; supportive of nature."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "biology",
        "ecology",
        "natural-sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nature-positive"
}

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more nature-positive",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most nature-positive",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "nature-positive (comparative more nature-positive, superlative most nature-positive)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "en:Ecology"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2021 October 28, Frans Timmermans, Achim Steiner, Sandrine Dixson-Declève, “Net zero is not enough – we need to build a nature-positive future”, in The Guardian",
          "text": "At the same time, the extent of our planetary emergency – of climate crisis, biodiversity loss and inequality – has become evident. As we rebuild our societies and economies, we are faced with a unique opportunity to build a nature-positive future that we must not let slip away.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2022 December 19, Patrick Greenfield, Phoebe Weston, “Cop15: historic deal struck to halt biodiversity loss by 2030”, in The Guardian",
          "text": "Observers expressed disappointment at the weaker-than-hoped-for language on consumption and pesticide use, both significant drivers of biodiversity loss. The term “nature positive”, which some scientists had said would be the biodiversity equivalent of “net zero”, did not appear in the agreement.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "environmentally friendly; supportive of nature."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "ecology",
          "ecology"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(ecology) environmentally friendly; supportive of nature."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "biology",
        "ecology",
        "natural-sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nature-positive"
}