"monstrous agreement" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "Sandhya Sundaresan",
        "in": "2011",
        "nocat": "1",
        "occ": "linguist",
        "w": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "Coined by linguist Sandhya Sundaresan in 2011",
      "name": "coinage"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Coined by linguist Sandhya Sundaresan in 2011.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "monstrous agreement (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Linguistics",
          "orig": "en:Linguistics",
          "parents": [
            "Language",
            "Social sciences",
            "Communication",
            "Sciences",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2020, Rahul Balusu, “The Quotative Complementizer Says “I’m too Baroque for that””, in Bhamati Dash, Gurmeet Kaur, editors, Proceedings of FASAL 8, page 6:",
          "text": "Why can’t we analyze them as quotation (full or partial/mixed)? Because grammatical dependencies cannot cross quotation marks, whereas in monstrous agreement they do.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2020, Peter W. Smith, Johannes Mursell, Katharina Hartmann, “Some remarks on agreement within the Minimalist Programme”, in Agree to Agree: Agreement in the Minimalist Programme, →ISBN, page 24:",
          "text": "McFadden shows that in case of monstrous agreement, allocutive agreement in the lower clause must reflect the relationship of the author of the embedded speech act to the addressee of that same speech act, and not the addressee of the overall speech act.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2021, Mikhail Knyazev, “Inter-Speaker Variation and Construction-Specific Restrictions on Indexical Shift in Poshkart Chuvash”, in Julia Sinitsyna, Sergei Tatevosov, editors, Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics), page 97:",
          "text": "Interestingly, not all speakers accept the monstrous agreement pattern. There are speakers for whom examples like (3a) sound very unnatural (while not totally ungrammatical).",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The phenomenon, in certain languages, of anaphoric references within an item of reported speech to the subject of the report agreeing in the first person (equivalent to *“He said that he am coming”)."
      ],
      "id": "en-monstrous_agreement-en-noun-OdgI0iXG",
      "links": [
        [
          "linguistics",
          "linguistics"
        ],
        [
          "phenomenon",
          "phenomenon"
        ],
        [
          "anaphoric",
          "anaphoric"
        ],
        [
          "reference",
          "reference"
        ],
        [
          "reported speech",
          "reported speech"
        ],
        [
          "subject",
          "subject"
        ],
        [
          "agree",
          "agree"
        ],
        [
          "first person",
          "first person"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(linguistics) The phenomenon, in certain languages, of anaphoric references within an item of reported speech to the subject of the report agreeing in the first person (equivalent to *“He said that he am coming”)."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "monstrous agreement"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "Sandhya Sundaresan",
        "in": "2011",
        "nocat": "1",
        "occ": "linguist",
        "w": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "Coined by linguist Sandhya Sundaresan in 2011",
      "name": "coinage"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Coined by linguist Sandhya Sundaresan in 2011.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "monstrous agreement (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Linguistics"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2020, Rahul Balusu, “The Quotative Complementizer Says “I’m too Baroque for that””, in Bhamati Dash, Gurmeet Kaur, editors, Proceedings of FASAL 8, page 6:",
          "text": "Why can’t we analyze them as quotation (full or partial/mixed)? Because grammatical dependencies cannot cross quotation marks, whereas in monstrous agreement they do.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2020, Peter W. Smith, Johannes Mursell, Katharina Hartmann, “Some remarks on agreement within the Minimalist Programme”, in Agree to Agree: Agreement in the Minimalist Programme, →ISBN, page 24:",
          "text": "McFadden shows that in case of monstrous agreement, allocutive agreement in the lower clause must reflect the relationship of the author of the embedded speech act to the addressee of that same speech act, and not the addressee of the overall speech act.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2021, Mikhail Knyazev, “Inter-Speaker Variation and Construction-Specific Restrictions on Indexical Shift in Poshkart Chuvash”, in Julia Sinitsyna, Sergei Tatevosov, editors, Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics), page 97:",
          "text": "Interestingly, not all speakers accept the monstrous agreement pattern. There are speakers for whom examples like (3a) sound very unnatural (while not totally ungrammatical).",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The phenomenon, in certain languages, of anaphoric references within an item of reported speech to the subject of the report agreeing in the first person (equivalent to *“He said that he am coming”)."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "linguistics",
          "linguistics"
        ],
        [
          "phenomenon",
          "phenomenon"
        ],
        [
          "anaphoric",
          "anaphoric"
        ],
        [
          "reference",
          "reference"
        ],
        [
          "reported speech",
          "reported speech"
        ],
        [
          "subject",
          "subject"
        ],
        [
          "agree",
          "agree"
        ],
        [
          "first person",
          "first person"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(linguistics) The phenomenon, in certain languages, of anaphoric references within an item of reported speech to the subject of the report agreeing in the first person (equivalent to *“He said that he am coming”)."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "monstrous agreement"
}