"illocute" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "illocution"
      },
      "expansion": "Back-formation from illocution",
      "name": "back-formation"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Back-formation from illocution.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "illocutes",
      "tags": [
        "present",
        "singular",
        "third-person"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "illocuting",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "present"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "illocuted",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "past"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "illocuted",
      "tags": [
        "past"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "illocute (third-person singular simple present illocutes, present participle illocuting, simple past and past participle illocuted)",
      "name": "en-verb"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "verb",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English back-formations",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Philosophy",
          "orig": "en:Philosophy",
          "parents": [
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Pragmatics",
          "orig": "en:Pragmatics",
          "parents": [
            "Linguistics",
            "Language",
            "Social sciences",
            "Communication",
            "Sciences",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1981, Peter Cole, Radical pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, →OCLC, page 93",
          "text": "In some such cases, at least, there will be illocutions q such that S can illocute q and thereby (among other things) convey to A that p.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, J.F. Rosenberg, Linguistic Representation, Springer Netherlands, page 11",
          "text": "Typically, one can illocute in order to perlocute, but not conversely.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2019, Mari Mikkola, Pornography: A Philosophical Introduction, Oxford University Press, page 66",
          "text": "So, we must not conflate consent with nonrefusal: a failure to illocute refusal does not entail that one has illocuted consent to sex instead.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2022 January 27, Mitchell Green, Jan G. Michel, “What Might Machines Mean?”, in Minds and Machines, volume 32, pages 323–338",
          "text": "[…] [S]ome of these refinements also help us make progress on the question whether machines can illocute.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "To perform an illocutionary act."
      ],
      "id": "en-illocute-en-verb-wiBvFHYP",
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "pragmatics",
          "pragmatics"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy, pragmatics, intransitive or transitive with the speech act as object) To perform an illocutionary act."
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "locute"
        },
        {
          "word": "perlocute"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "philosophy",
        "pragmatics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "illocute"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "illocution"
      },
      "expansion": "Back-formation from illocution",
      "name": "back-formation"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Back-formation from illocution.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "illocutes",
      "tags": [
        "present",
        "singular",
        "third-person"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "illocuting",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "present"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "illocuted",
      "tags": [
        "participle",
        "past"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "illocuted",
      "tags": [
        "past"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "illocute (third-person singular simple present illocutes, present participle illocuting, simple past and past participle illocuted)",
      "name": "en-verb"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "verb",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "locute"
    },
    {
      "word": "perlocute"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English back-formations",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English intransitive verbs",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English transitive verbs",
        "English verbs",
        "en:Philosophy",
        "en:Pragmatics"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1981, Peter Cole, Radical pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, →OCLC, page 93",
          "text": "In some such cases, at least, there will be illocutions q such that S can illocute q and thereby (among other things) convey to A that p.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, J.F. Rosenberg, Linguistic Representation, Springer Netherlands, page 11",
          "text": "Typically, one can illocute in order to perlocute, but not conversely.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2019, Mari Mikkola, Pornography: A Philosophical Introduction, Oxford University Press, page 66",
          "text": "So, we must not conflate consent with nonrefusal: a failure to illocute refusal does not entail that one has illocuted consent to sex instead.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2022 January 27, Mitchell Green, Jan G. Michel, “What Might Machines Mean?”, in Minds and Machines, volume 32, pages 323–338",
          "text": "[…] [S]ome of these refinements also help us make progress on the question whether machines can illocute.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "To perform an illocutionary act."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "pragmatics",
          "pragmatics"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy, pragmatics, intransitive or transitive with the speech act as object) To perform an illocutionary act."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "linguistics",
        "philosophy",
        "pragmatics",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "illocute"
}