"fallacy of composition" meaning in English

{
  "antonyms": [
    {
      "word": "fallacy of division"
    }
  ],
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "fallacies of composition",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "fallacies of composition"
      },
      "expansion": "fallacy of composition (plural fallacies of composition)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Logical fallacies",
          "orig": "en:Logical fallacies",
          "parents": [
            "Logic",
            "Rhetoric",
            "Formal sciences",
            "Philosophy",
            "Language",
            "Sciences",
            "All topics",
            "Communication",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996 March 29, Noël Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, →ISBN, →OL, page 229:",
          "text": "A theorist who moves from the putative fact that every shot in a given nonfiction film represents a personal point-of-view to the conclusion that every nonfiction film is a personal vision commits the fallacy of composition.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, “Conclusion: Psychology, Neuroscience, and Economics”, in David K. Levine, editor, Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, →ISBN, →OL, page 127:",
          "text": "There is a small segment of the psychology literature that effectively commits a fallacy of composition, reasoning that if we can explain individual behavior, then this carries over immediately to the group.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2013 August 5, Richard E. Creel, Philosophy of Religion: The Basics, Wiley Blackwell:",
          "text": "The cosmological argument, according to Edwards, commits the fallacy of composition because it assumes that because each part of the universe is caused that therefore the universe as a whole must have a cause, but that doesn't take into account the possibility of an infinite regress of events.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A presumption that if something is true of part(s) of a whole, then it is true of the whole itself."
      ],
      "id": "en-fallacy_of_composition-en-noun-p1b0Vkr9",
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "spotlight fallacy"
        }
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "fallacy of composition"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "fallacy of composition"
}

{
  "antonyms": [
    {
      "word": "fallacy of division"
    }
  ],
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "fallacies of composition",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "fallacies of composition"
      },
      "expansion": "fallacy of composition (plural fallacies of composition)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "spotlight fallacy"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Logical fallacies"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996 March 29, Noël Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, →ISBN, →OL, page 229:",
          "text": "A theorist who moves from the putative fact that every shot in a given nonfiction film represents a personal point-of-view to the conclusion that every nonfiction film is a personal vision commits the fallacy of composition.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, “Conclusion: Psychology, Neuroscience, and Economics”, in David K. Levine, editor, Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, →ISBN, →OL, page 127:",
          "text": "There is a small segment of the psychology literature that effectively commits a fallacy of composition, reasoning that if we can explain individual behavior, then this carries over immediately to the group.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2013 August 5, Richard E. Creel, Philosophy of Religion: The Basics, Wiley Blackwell:",
          "text": "The cosmological argument, according to Edwards, commits the fallacy of composition because it assumes that because each part of the universe is caused that therefore the universe as a whole must have a cause, but that doesn't take into account the possibility of an infinite regress of events.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A presumption that if something is true of part(s) of a whole, then it is true of the whole itself."
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "fallacy of composition"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "fallacy of composition"
}