"fallacy of composition" meaning in English

See fallacy of composition in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Noun

Forms: fallacies of composition [plural]
Head templates: {{en-noun|fallacies of composition}} fallacy of composition (plural fallacies of composition)
  1. A presumption that if something is true of part(s) of a whole, then it is true of the whole itself. Wikipedia link: fallacy of composition Categories (topical): Logical fallacies Related terms: spotlight fallacy

Inflected forms

Download JSON data for fallacy of composition meaning in English (2.7kB)

{
  "antonyms": [
    {
      "word": "fallacy of division"
    }
  ],
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "fallacies of composition",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "fallacies of composition"
      },
      "expansion": "fallacy of composition (plural fallacies of composition)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with topic categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
          "parents": [
            "Terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Logical fallacies",
          "orig": "en:Logical fallacies",
          "parents": [
            "Logic",
            "Rhetoric",
            "Formal sciences",
            "Philosophy",
            "Language",
            "Sciences",
            "All topics",
            "Communication",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996 March 29, Noël Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, →OL, page 229",
          "text": "A theorist who moves from the putative fact that every shot in a given nonfiction film represents a personal point-of-view to the conclusion that every nonfiction film is a personal vision commits the fallacy of composition.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, “Conclusion: Psychology, Neuroscience, and Economics”, in David K. Levine, editor, Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, →OL, page 127",
          "text": "There is a small segment of the psychology literature that effectively commits a fallacy of composition, reasoning that if we can explain individual behavior, then this carries over immediately to the group.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2013 August 5, Richard E. Creel, Philosophy of Religion: The Basics, Wiley Blackwell",
          "text": "The cosmological argument, according to Edwards, commits the fallacy of composition because it assumes that because each part of the universe is caused that therefore the universe as a whole must have a cause, but that doesn't take into account the possibility of an infinite regress of events.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A presumption that if something is true of part(s) of a whole, then it is true of the whole itself."
      ],
      "id": "en-fallacy_of_composition-en-noun-p1b0Vkr9",
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "spotlight fallacy"
        }
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "fallacy of composition"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "fallacy of composition"
}
{
  "antonyms": [
    {
      "word": "fallacy of division"
    }
  ],
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "fallacies of composition",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "fallacies of composition"
      },
      "expansion": "fallacy of composition (plural fallacies of composition)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "spotlight fallacy"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "en:Logical fallacies"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996 March 29, Noël Carroll, Theorizing the Moving Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, →OL, page 229",
          "text": "A theorist who moves from the putative fact that every shot in a given nonfiction film represents a personal point-of-view to the conclusion that every nonfiction film is a personal vision commits the fallacy of composition.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, “Conclusion: Psychology, Neuroscience, and Economics”, in David K. Levine, editor, Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, →OL, page 127",
          "text": "There is a small segment of the psychology literature that effectively commits a fallacy of composition, reasoning that if we can explain individual behavior, then this carries over immediately to the group.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2013 August 5, Richard E. Creel, Philosophy of Religion: The Basics, Wiley Blackwell",
          "text": "The cosmological argument, according to Edwards, commits the fallacy of composition because it assumes that because each part of the universe is caused that therefore the universe as a whole must have a cause, but that doesn't take into account the possibility of an infinite regress of events.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "A presumption that if something is true of part(s) of a whole, then it is true of the whole itself."
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "fallacy of composition"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "fallacy of composition"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-03 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-05-02 using wiktextract (f4fd8c9 and c9440ce). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.