See etymological argument in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
Download JSON data for etymological argument meaning in English (3.3kB)
{
"forms": [
{
"form": "etymological arguments",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "etymological argument (plural etymological arguments)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "other",
"name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
"parents": [
"Entries with incorrect language header",
"Entry maintenance"
],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "topical",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Linguistics",
"orig": "en:Linguistics",
"parents": [
"Language",
"Social sciences",
"Communication",
"Sciences",
"Society",
"All topics",
"Fundamental"
],
"source": "w"
},
{
"kind": "topical",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Philosophy",
"orig": "en:Philosophy",
"parents": [
"All topics",
"Fundamental"
],
"source": "w"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1877, Vladimir Sergeyevich Solovyov, translated by Valerie Z. Nollan, The Philosophical Principles of Integral Knowledge, Eerdmans, published 2008, page 58",
"text": "But it goes without saying that this etymological argument in and of itself has no significance, since a word taken from a dead language may resultantly assume a meaning independent of its etymology.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "1970, Josiah B. Gould, The Philosophy of Chrysippus, page 148",
"text": "Nothing need be said about the etymological argument except perhaps that it was characteristic of Stoic philosophers to think such an argument could be used with force, because they believed that language is not conventional, but natural.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "1998, Rachel Barney, “Socrates Agonistes: The Case of the Cratylus Etymologies”, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume XVI, page 68",
"text": "And if we look to post-Platonic texts, etymological argument for philosophical positions seems to become common practice.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2005, Roy Harris, The Semantics of Science, page 19",
"text": "Aristotle also throws in a dubious etymological argument: this is why it has the name ‘money’ (nomisma)—because it exists not by nature but by law (nomos) and it is in our power to change it and make it useless. (Nicomachean Ethics 1133a30-31)",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2013, Graham Harman, Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects, page 111",
"text": "In support of this supposed brotherhood between ready-to-hand and present-at-hand, Bernasconi offers the fashionable but shaky etymological argument that both terms contain the word “hand,” the organ which is traditionally regarded as the instrument of production.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Explanation and analysis—often considered controversial—of one or more concepts or linguistic terms by means of an exposition of their linguistic origins."
],
"id": "en-etymological_argument-en-noun-7b2EyoS3",
"links": [
[
"philosophy",
"philosophy"
],
[
"linguistics",
"linguistics"
],
[
"Explanation",
"explanation"
],
[
"analysis",
"analysis"
],
[
"controversial",
"controversial"
],
[
"concept",
"concept"
],
[
"exposition",
"exposition"
],
[
"origin",
"origin"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(philosophy, linguistics) Explanation and analysis—often considered controversial—of one or more concepts or linguistic terms by means of an exposition of their linguistic origins."
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"linguistics",
"philosophy",
"sciences"
]
}
],
"word": "etymological argument"
}
{
"forms": [
{
"form": "etymological arguments",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "etymological argument (plural etymological arguments)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English lemmas",
"English multiword terms",
"English nouns",
"English terms with quotations",
"Quotation templates to be cleaned",
"en:Linguistics",
"en:Philosophy"
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1877, Vladimir Sergeyevich Solovyov, translated by Valerie Z. Nollan, The Philosophical Principles of Integral Knowledge, Eerdmans, published 2008, page 58",
"text": "But it goes without saying that this etymological argument in and of itself has no significance, since a word taken from a dead language may resultantly assume a meaning independent of its etymology.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "1970, Josiah B. Gould, The Philosophy of Chrysippus, page 148",
"text": "Nothing need be said about the etymological argument except perhaps that it was characteristic of Stoic philosophers to think such an argument could be used with force, because they believed that language is not conventional, but natural.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "1998, Rachel Barney, “Socrates Agonistes: The Case of the Cratylus Etymologies”, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume XVI, page 68",
"text": "And if we look to post-Platonic texts, etymological argument for philosophical positions seems to become common practice.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2005, Roy Harris, The Semantics of Science, page 19",
"text": "Aristotle also throws in a dubious etymological argument: this is why it has the name ‘money’ (nomisma)—because it exists not by nature but by law (nomos) and it is in our power to change it and make it useless. (Nicomachean Ethics 1133a30-31)",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2013, Graham Harman, Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects, page 111",
"text": "In support of this supposed brotherhood between ready-to-hand and present-at-hand, Bernasconi offers the fashionable but shaky etymological argument that both terms contain the word “hand,” the organ which is traditionally regarded as the instrument of production.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"Explanation and analysis—often considered controversial—of one or more concepts or linguistic terms by means of an exposition of their linguistic origins."
],
"links": [
[
"philosophy",
"philosophy"
],
[
"linguistics",
"linguistics"
],
[
"Explanation",
"explanation"
],
[
"analysis",
"analysis"
],
[
"controversial",
"controversial"
],
[
"concept",
"concept"
],
[
"exposition",
"exposition"
],
[
"origin",
"origin"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(philosophy, linguistics) Explanation and analysis—often considered controversial—of one or more concepts or linguistic terms by means of an exposition of their linguistic origins."
],
"topics": [
"human-sciences",
"linguistics",
"philosophy",
"sciences"
]
}
],
"word": "etymological argument"
}
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-01 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-04-21 using wiktextract (f4fd8c9 and c9440ce). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.