See KJV-onlyer in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
{ "etymology_templates": [ { "args": { "1": "en", "2": "KJV", "3": "only", "4": "-er", "id3": "ideology" }, "expansion": "KJV + only + -er", "name": "af" } ], "etymology_text": "From KJV + only + -er.", "forms": [ { "form": "KJV-onlyers", "tags": [ "plural" ] } ], "head_templates": [ { "args": {}, "expansion": "KJV-onlyer (plural KJV-onlyers)", "name": "en-noun" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "noun", "senses": [ { "categories": [ { "kind": "other", "name": "English entries with incorrect language header", "parents": [ "Entries with incorrect language header", "Entry maintenance" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "English terms suffixed with -er (ideology)", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with 1 entry", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with entries", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "topical", "langcode": "en", "name": "Christianity", "orig": "en:Christianity", "parents": [ "Abrahamism", "Religion", "Culture", "Society", "All topics", "Fundamental" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "topical", "langcode": "en", "name": "People", "orig": "en:People", "parents": [ "Human", "All topics", "Fundamental" ], "source": "w" } ], "examples": [ { "ref": "1997 August 16, Trevor Peterson, “Re: Contradictions in the Bible”, in christnet.theology (Usenet):", "text": "The meaning that can be derived from the word itself is \"without error.\" In other words, the Bible was given without error of any sort. Now, excepting KJV-onlyers, most inerrantists would limit inerrancy to the original writings, none of which currently exist.", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "1997 October 13, Daniel Arseneault, “Re: Is The KJV Inspired?”, in alt.religion.christian.anabaptist.brethren (Usenet):", "text": "(Seeing as how Erasmus was a Roman Catholic who set the Vulgate at a level where modern KJV-onlyers set it, he might have believed the Vulgate was perfect, so such texts absent from his Greek manuscripts probably were present in the original, in his thinking); […]", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2004 January 14, Mark Sornson, “Re: Another troubling statement from \"God's\" organization - Can anyone confirm or deny?”, in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn (Usenet):", "text": "[…] [As a side note, at least the first two in your list have people whose full-time job it is to hate them. I can't recall too many slams against the NASB, but I imagine that KJV-onlyers hate it.]", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "Someone who asserts that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations." ], "id": "en-KJV-onlyer-en-noun-a6jlqyP7", "links": [ [ "King James Version", "King James Version" ], [ "Bible", "Bible" ], [ "English", "English" ] ], "raw_glosses": [ "(informal) Someone who asserts that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations." ], "synonyms": [ { "word": "KJV-onlier" } ], "tags": [ "informal" ] } ], "word": "KJV-onlyer" }
{ "etymology_templates": [ { "args": { "1": "en", "2": "KJV", "3": "only", "4": "-er", "id3": "ideology" }, "expansion": "KJV + only + -er", "name": "af" } ], "etymology_text": "From KJV + only + -er.", "forms": [ { "form": "KJV-onlyers", "tags": [ "plural" ] } ], "head_templates": [ { "args": {}, "expansion": "KJV-onlyer (plural KJV-onlyers)", "name": "en-noun" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "noun", "senses": [ { "categories": [ "English compound terms", "English countable nouns", "English entries with incorrect language header", "English informal terms", "English lemmas", "English multiword terms", "English nouns", "English terms suffixed with -er (ideology)", "English terms with quotations", "Pages with 1 entry", "Pages with entries", "en:Christianity", "en:People" ], "examples": [ { "ref": "1997 August 16, Trevor Peterson, “Re: Contradictions in the Bible”, in christnet.theology (Usenet):", "text": "The meaning that can be derived from the word itself is \"without error.\" In other words, the Bible was given without error of any sort. Now, excepting KJV-onlyers, most inerrantists would limit inerrancy to the original writings, none of which currently exist.", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "1997 October 13, Daniel Arseneault, “Re: Is The KJV Inspired?”, in alt.religion.christian.anabaptist.brethren (Usenet):", "text": "(Seeing as how Erasmus was a Roman Catholic who set the Vulgate at a level where modern KJV-onlyers set it, he might have believed the Vulgate was perfect, so such texts absent from his Greek manuscripts probably were present in the original, in his thinking); […]", "type": "quote" }, { "ref": "2004 January 14, Mark Sornson, “Re: Another troubling statement from \"God's\" organization - Can anyone confirm or deny?”, in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn (Usenet):", "text": "[…] [As a side note, at least the first two in your list have people whose full-time job it is to hate them. I can't recall too many slams against the NASB, but I imagine that KJV-onlyers hate it.]", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "Someone who asserts that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations." ], "links": [ [ "King James Version", "King James Version" ], [ "Bible", "Bible" ], [ "English", "English" ] ], "raw_glosses": [ "(informal) Someone who asserts that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations." ], "tags": [ "informal" ] } ], "synonyms": [ { "word": "KJV-onlier" } ], "word": "KJV-onlyer" }
Download raw JSONL data for KJV-onlyer meaning in English (2.4kB)
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2025-02-03 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2025-01-20 using wiktextract (05fdf6b and 9dbd323). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.