"metatheoretic" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "meta",
        "3": "theoretic"
      },
      "expansion": "meta- + theoretic",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From meta- + theoretic.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "metatheoretic (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "alt_of": [
        {
          "word": "metatheoretical"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with meta-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2015, Tiark Rompf, Nada Amin, “From F to DOT: Type Soundness Proofs with Definitional Interpreters”, in arXiv:",
          "text": "Unfortunately, type soundness has only been established for a very restricted subset of DOT (muDOT), and it has been shown that adding important Scala features such as type refinement or extending subtyping to a lattice breaks at least one key metatheoretic property such as narrowing or subtyping transitivity, which are usually required for a type soundness proof. The first main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate how, perhaps surprisingly, even though these properties are lost in their full generality, a richer DOT calculus that includes both type refinement and a subtyping lattice with intersection types can still be proved sound.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Alternative form of metatheoretical"
      ],
      "id": "en-metatheoretic-en-adj-7iZ5j8Nb",
      "links": [
        [
          "metatheoretical",
          "metatheoretical#English"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "alt-of",
        "alternative",
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "metatheoretic"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "meta",
        "3": "theoretic"
      },
      "expansion": "meta- + theoretic",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From meta- + theoretic.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "metatheoretic (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "alt_of": [
        {
          "word": "metatheoretical"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with meta-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2015, Tiark Rompf, Nada Amin, “From F to DOT: Type Soundness Proofs with Definitional Interpreters”, in arXiv:",
          "text": "Unfortunately, type soundness has only been established for a very restricted subset of DOT (muDOT), and it has been shown that adding important Scala features such as type refinement or extending subtyping to a lattice breaks at least one key metatheoretic property such as narrowing or subtyping transitivity, which are usually required for a type soundness proof. The first main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate how, perhaps surprisingly, even though these properties are lost in their full generality, a richer DOT calculus that includes both type refinement and a subtyping lattice with intersection types can still be proved sound.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Alternative form of metatheoretical"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "metatheoretical",
          "metatheoretical#English"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "alt-of",
        "alternative",
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "metatheoretic"
}