"-drecht" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "nl",
        "2": "dum",
        "3": "-drecht"
      },
      "expansion": "Middle Dutch -drecht",
      "name": "inh"
    },
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "nl",
        "2": "qfa-sub",
        "3": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "substrate",
      "name": "der"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Middle Dutch -drecht.\nVan Berkel and Samplonius (2006) derive this element from *drifti- (“creek, waterway”) (related to modern Dutch drijven (“to float”), following earlier scholars.\nVan Osta (1996) however considers this unlikely for various reasons; for example, the ft to cht change that this view supposes is contradicted by the fact that in earlier attestations and in dialects where this change did not happen until much later, -cht is always found instead of the expected -ft. In his conclusion he follows Pottmeyer (1929) in his view that the element likely is to be reconstructed as a noun derived from *draganą (“to pull, draw, carry”), but unlike Pottmeyer (who interprets it as a portage), Van Osta believes it refers to a waterway with a towpath.\nThe old explanation, that -drecht is derived from Latin traiectum (which is the case for the toponymic element -trecht in Utrecht for example), has been rejected by many scholars (due to the unexplained change of tr to dr, among other reasons), though the claim is still repeated by some authors. Van Osta treats this at length.\nAlso see hypotheses in Ancient Belgian language which suggest substrate influence.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "nl",
        "2": "suffixes"
      },
      "expansion": "-drecht",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "Dutch",
  "lang_code": "nl",
  "pos": "suffix",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Dutch entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Dutch terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
          "parents": [
            "Terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "derived": [
        {
          "word": "Drechtsteden"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "a common element in Dutch placenames. The exact meaning is contested; see etymology"
      ],
      "id": "en--drecht-nl-suffix-Gu0nSpQM",
      "tags": [
        "morpheme"
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "Ancient Belgian language"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sounds": [
    {
      "ipa": "/drɛxt/"
    }
  ],
  "word": "-drecht"
}

{
  "derived": [
    {
      "word": "Drechtsteden"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "nl",
        "2": "dum",
        "3": "-drecht"
      },
      "expansion": "Middle Dutch -drecht",
      "name": "inh"
    },
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "nl",
        "2": "qfa-sub",
        "3": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "substrate",
      "name": "der"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Middle Dutch -drecht.\nVan Berkel and Samplonius (2006) derive this element from *drifti- (“creek, waterway”) (related to modern Dutch drijven (“to float”), following earlier scholars.\nVan Osta (1996) however considers this unlikely for various reasons; for example, the ft to cht change that this view supposes is contradicted by the fact that in earlier attestations and in dialects where this change did not happen until much later, -cht is always found instead of the expected -ft. In his conclusion he follows Pottmeyer (1929) in his view that the element likely is to be reconstructed as a noun derived from *draganą (“to pull, draw, carry”), but unlike Pottmeyer (who interprets it as a portage), Van Osta believes it refers to a waterway with a towpath.\nThe old explanation, that -drecht is derived from Latin traiectum (which is the case for the toponymic element -trecht in Utrecht for example), has been rejected by many scholars (due to the unexplained change of tr to dr, among other reasons), though the claim is still repeated by some authors. Van Osta treats this at length.\nAlso see hypotheses in Ancient Belgian language which suggest substrate influence.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "nl",
        "2": "suffixes"
      },
      "expansion": "-drecht",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "Dutch",
  "lang_code": "nl",
  "pos": "suffix",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "Dutch entries with incorrect language header",
        "Dutch lemmas",
        "Dutch suffixes",
        "Dutch terms derived from Middle Dutch",
        "Dutch terms derived from substrate languages",
        "Dutch terms inherited from Middle Dutch",
        "Dutch terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
        "Dutch unproductive suffixes",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "a common element in Dutch placenames. The exact meaning is contested; see etymology"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "morpheme"
      ],
      "wikipedia": [
        "Ancient Belgian language"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sounds": [
    {
      "ipa": "/drɛxt/"
    }
  ],
  "word": "-drecht"
}