"unrelativized" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "un",
        "3": "relativized"
      },
      "expansion": "un- + relativized",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From un- + relativized.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "unrelativized (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with un-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2008 November 19, Paul Boghossian, “Replies to Wright, MacFarlane and Sosa”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 141, number 3, →DOI:",
          "text": "Instead of recommending that the relativist talk only in explicitly relativized terms about what his epistemic system allows or forbids, the hybrid view would allow him to utter sentences that look unrelativized, but would insist that they now be treated as having only assessment-relative truth-values and no absolute truth-values.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not relativized"
      ],
      "id": "en-unrelativized-en-adj-tcB6TOK3",
      "links": [
        [
          "relativized",
          "relativized"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "unrelativized"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "un",
        "3": "relativized"
      },
      "expansion": "un- + relativized",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From un- + relativized.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "unrelativized (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with un-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2008 November 19, Paul Boghossian, “Replies to Wright, MacFarlane and Sosa”, in Philosophical Studies, volume 141, number 3, →DOI:",
          "text": "Instead of recommending that the relativist talk only in explicitly relativized terms about what his epistemic system allows or forbids, the hybrid view would allow him to utter sentences that look unrelativized, but would insist that they now be treated as having only assessment-relative truth-values and no absolute truth-values.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not relativized"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "relativized",
          "relativized"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "unrelativized"
}