"uncrossexamined" meaning in English

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "uncrossexamined (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1978, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Thomas V. Brierton, page 14",
          "text": "In its Memorandum Decision dated November 3, 1977, the District Court found that the testimony of Mr. Mannion and Officer Boyle was without probative force because their hearsay statements were uncrossexamined. And yet just such uncrossexamined hearsay statements were used by the Court in Roviaro v. United States, […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not having undergone a cross-examination."
      ],
      "id": "en-uncrossexamined-en-adj-5WYRMChL",
      "links": [
        [
          "cross-examination",
          "cross-examination"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "uncrossexamined"
}

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "uncrossexamined (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1978, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Thomas V. Brierton, page 14",
          "text": "In its Memorandum Decision dated November 3, 1977, the District Court found that the testimony of Mr. Mannion and Officer Boyle was without probative force because their hearsay statements were uncrossexamined. And yet just such uncrossexamined hearsay statements were used by the Court in Roviaro v. United States, […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not having undergone a cross-examination."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "cross-examination",
          "cross-examination"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "uncrossexamined"
}