"syllogismhood" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "syllogism",
        "3": "hood"
      },
      "expansion": "syllogism + -hood",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From syllogism + -hood.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "syllogismhood (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -hood",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, volume XIV, page 189:",
          "text": "Rather, we should assume that the Stoics had — independently of the themata — some pretechnical notion of syllogismhood, and that the indemonstrables plus themata were devised in order to 'capture' this notion; perhaps also to make it more lucid and precise.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1999, Keimpe Algra, The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, page 149:",
          "text": "It leaves us with the following problem: how can we find the independent Stoic criteria for syllogismhood?",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2001, R. W. Sharples, Whose Aristotle? Whose Aristotelianism?, page 110:",
          "text": "These triplets are, if I may so put it, candidates for syllogismhood.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The property of being a syllogism."
      ],
      "id": "en-syllogismhood-en-noun-iXHIgrpn",
      "links": [
        [
          "syllogism",
          "syllogism"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(rare) The property of being a syllogism."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "rare",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "syllogismhood"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "syllogism",
        "3": "hood"
      },
      "expansion": "syllogism + -hood",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From syllogism + -hood.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "syllogismhood (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms suffixed with -hood",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English terms with rare senses",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, volume XIV, page 189:",
          "text": "Rather, we should assume that the Stoics had — independently of the themata — some pretechnical notion of syllogismhood, and that the indemonstrables plus themata were devised in order to 'capture' this notion; perhaps also to make it more lucid and precise.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1999, Keimpe Algra, The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, page 149:",
          "text": "It leaves us with the following problem: how can we find the independent Stoic criteria for syllogismhood?",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2001, R. W. Sharples, Whose Aristotle? Whose Aristotelianism?, page 110:",
          "text": "These triplets are, if I may so put it, candidates for syllogismhood.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The property of being a syllogism."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "syllogism",
          "syllogism"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(rare) The property of being a syllogism."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "rare",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "syllogismhood"
}