"spectatordom" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "spectator",
        "3": "dom"
      },
      "expansion": "spectator + -dom",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From spectator + -dom.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "spectatordom (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -dom",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1986, Stephen W. Melville, Philosophy Beside Itself: On Deconstruction and Modernism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, →OCLC, page 14",
          "text": "Most important, Manet seems intuitively to have recognized that Courbet’s attempt to abolish the very possibility of spectatordom was doomed in every instance to (ontological not artistic) failure, or at any rate that success in that attempt was literally inconceivable, and that it was necessary to establish the beholder’s presence abstractly—to build into the painting the separateness, distancedness, and mutual facing that I have associated with the painting-beholder relationship in its traditional or unreconstructed form—in order that the worst consequences of theatricalization of that relationship be averted.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1989 December 15, John Bender, Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind in Eighteenth-Century England, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, →OCLC, page 227",
          "text": "He considers spectatordom as the fundamental condition ordering social life, but the state of being he characterizes as theatrical must always be staged in a nontheatrical mental field that much more closely resembles the transparency of the realist novel than the non-narrative fictions of theater.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The role or status of spectator."
      ],
      "id": "en-spectatordom-en-noun-6qu0SfyO",
      "links": [
        [
          "role",
          "role"
        ],
        [
          "status",
          "status"
        ],
        [
          "spectator",
          "spectator"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "spectatordom"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "spectator",
        "3": "dom"
      },
      "expansion": "spectator + -dom",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From spectator + -dom.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "spectatordom (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms suffixed with -dom",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1986, Stephen W. Melville, Philosophy Beside Itself: On Deconstruction and Modernism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, →OCLC, page 14",
          "text": "Most important, Manet seems intuitively to have recognized that Courbet’s attempt to abolish the very possibility of spectatordom was doomed in every instance to (ontological not artistic) failure, or at any rate that success in that attempt was literally inconceivable, and that it was necessary to establish the beholder’s presence abstractly—to build into the painting the separateness, distancedness, and mutual facing that I have associated with the painting-beholder relationship in its traditional or unreconstructed form—in order that the worst consequences of theatricalization of that relationship be averted.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1989 December 15, John Bender, Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind in Eighteenth-Century England, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, →OCLC, page 227",
          "text": "He considers spectatordom as the fundamental condition ordering social life, but the state of being he characterizes as theatrical must always be staged in a nontheatrical mental field that much more closely resembles the transparency of the realist novel than the non-narrative fictions of theater.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The role or status of spectator."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "role",
          "role"
        ],
        [
          "status",
          "status"
        ],
        [
          "spectator",
          "spectator"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "spectatordom"
}