"preconciliar" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "pre",
        "3": "conciliar"
      },
      "expansion": "pre- + conciliar",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "pre- + conciliar",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "?"
      },
      "expansion": "preconciliar",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "antonyms": [
        {
          "word": "postconciliar"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with pre-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Christianity",
          "orig": "en:Christianity",
          "parents": [
            "Abrahamism",
            "Religion",
            "Culture",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1912, Cuthbert Hamilton Turner, Studies in Early Church History: Collected Papers, Oxford: Clarendon Press, page 52",
          "text": "Whether the patriarchal Churches then owed their uniqueness ultimately to their civil position or to their ecclesiastical traditions will be a question to which Chalcedon gives no answer, or rather gives two inconsistent ones. We are thrown back for the solution of the problem on Nicaea and its recognition of the pre-eminence of Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch. But since what was recognised at Nicaea was not created there, the investigation belongs rather to the pre-conciliar era of Christianity, and must for the moment be deferred.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1912 November, Shailer Mathews, “The Social Origin of Theology”, in American Journal of Sociology, volume 18, number 3, →DOI, →ISSN, page 316",
          "text": "Any theological reconstruction therefore that would be thorough-going and do for our age what the original creators of theology did for theirs in preconciliar periods must face two tasks[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "In or of the period before an ecclesiastical council, especially the Second Vatican Council."
      ],
      "id": "en-preconciliar-en-adj-upYwTgAN",
      "links": [
        [
          "ecclesiastical",
          "ecclesiastical"
        ],
        [
          "council",
          "council"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "pre-conciliar"
        },
        {
          "word": "pre-Conciliar"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "preconciliar"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "pre",
        "3": "conciliar"
      },
      "expansion": "pre- + conciliar",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "pre- + conciliar",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "?"
      },
      "expansion": "preconciliar",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "antonyms": [
        {
          "word": "postconciliar"
        }
      ],
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with pre-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "en:Christianity"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1912, Cuthbert Hamilton Turner, Studies in Early Church History: Collected Papers, Oxford: Clarendon Press, page 52",
          "text": "Whether the patriarchal Churches then owed their uniqueness ultimately to their civil position or to their ecclesiastical traditions will be a question to which Chalcedon gives no answer, or rather gives two inconsistent ones. We are thrown back for the solution of the problem on Nicaea and its recognition of the pre-eminence of Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch. But since what was recognised at Nicaea was not created there, the investigation belongs rather to the pre-conciliar era of Christianity, and must for the moment be deferred.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1912 November, Shailer Mathews, “The Social Origin of Theology”, in American Journal of Sociology, volume 18, number 3, →DOI, →ISSN, page 316",
          "text": "Any theological reconstruction therefore that would be thorough-going and do for our age what the original creators of theology did for theirs in preconciliar periods must face two tasks[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "In or of the period before an ecclesiastical council, especially the Second Vatican Council."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "ecclesiastical",
          "ecclesiastical"
        ],
        [
          "council",
          "council"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "pre-conciliar"
    },
    {
      "word": "pre-Conciliar"
    }
  ],
  "word": "preconciliar"
}