"offensive to pious ears" meaning in English

See offensive to pious ears in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Adjective

Etymology: Calque of Ecclesiastical Latin piārum aurium offēnsīvus. Etymology templates: {{calque|en|EL.|piārum aurium offēnsīvus}} Calque of Ecclesiastical Latin piārum aurium offēnsīvus Head templates: {{en-adj|?}} offensive to pious ears
  1. (Roman Catholicism) Describing a doctrine or proposition that is not heretical, but formulated improperly or ambiguously and hence liable to cause scandal. A formal censure. Categories (topical): Roman Catholicism
    Sense id: en-offensive_to_pious_ears-en-adj-14s5pgot Categories (other): English entries with incorrect language header Topics: Catholicism, Christianity, Roman-Catholicism

Download JSON data for offensive to pious ears meaning in English (2.7kB)

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "EL.",
        "3": "piārum aurium offēnsīvus"
      },
      "expansion": "Calque of Ecclesiastical Latin piārum aurium offēnsīvus",
      "name": "calque"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Calque of Ecclesiastical Latin piārum aurium offēnsīvus.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "?"
      },
      "expansion": "offensive to pious ears",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Roman Catholicism",
          "orig": "en:Roman Catholicism",
          "parents": [
            "Catholicism",
            "Christianity",
            "Abrahamism",
            "Religion",
            "Culture",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1910, William John Sparrow-Simpson, Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility, page 121",
          "text": "And Bishop Ullathorne concluded by condemning the journal as “containing propositions which are respectively subversive of the faith, heretical, approaching to heresy, erroneous, derogatory to the teaching of the Church, and offensive to pious ears.”",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1969, Harry J. McSorley, Luther: Right or Wrong? An Ecumenical-Theological Study of Luther’s Major Work, The Bondage of the Will, page 252",
          "text": "It is therefore impossible from Exsurge Domine alone to determine whether proposition 36 is condemned as heretical or merely as “offensive to pious ears.”",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2009, Christopher M. Bellitto, “The Reform Context of the Great Western Schism”, in Joëlle Rollo-Koster, Thomas M. Izbicki, editors, A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417), page 317",
          "text": "An investigatory commission in Oxford in 1378 declared that some of Wycliffe’s criticism were not incorrect in se but could be offensive to pious ears.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Describing a doctrine or proposition that is not heretical, but formulated improperly or ambiguously and hence liable to cause scandal. A formal censure."
      ],
      "id": "en-offensive_to_pious_ears-en-adj-14s5pgot",
      "links": [
        [
          "Roman Catholicism",
          "Roman Catholicism"
        ],
        [
          "doctrine",
          "doctrine"
        ],
        [
          "proposition",
          "proposition"
        ],
        [
          "heretical",
          "heretical"
        ],
        [
          "formulate",
          "formulate"
        ],
        [
          "improperly",
          "improperly"
        ],
        [
          "ambiguously",
          "ambiguously"
        ],
        [
          "scandal",
          "scandal"
        ],
        [
          "censure",
          "censure#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(Roman Catholicism) Describing a doctrine or proposition that is not heretical, but formulated improperly or ambiguously and hence liable to cause scandal. A formal censure."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "Catholicism",
        "Christianity",
        "Roman-Catholicism"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "offensive to pious ears"
}
{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "EL.",
        "3": "piārum aurium offēnsīvus"
      },
      "expansion": "Calque of Ecclesiastical Latin piārum aurium offēnsīvus",
      "name": "calque"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Calque of Ecclesiastical Latin piārum aurium offēnsīvus.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "?"
      },
      "expansion": "offensive to pious ears",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English terms calqued from Ecclesiastical Latin",
        "English terms derived from Ecclesiastical Latin",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "en:Roman Catholicism"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1910, William John Sparrow-Simpson, Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility, page 121",
          "text": "And Bishop Ullathorne concluded by condemning the journal as “containing propositions which are respectively subversive of the faith, heretical, approaching to heresy, erroneous, derogatory to the teaching of the Church, and offensive to pious ears.”",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1969, Harry J. McSorley, Luther: Right or Wrong? An Ecumenical-Theological Study of Luther’s Major Work, The Bondage of the Will, page 252",
          "text": "It is therefore impossible from Exsurge Domine alone to determine whether proposition 36 is condemned as heretical or merely as “offensive to pious ears.”",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2009, Christopher M. Bellitto, “The Reform Context of the Great Western Schism”, in Joëlle Rollo-Koster, Thomas M. Izbicki, editors, A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417), page 317",
          "text": "An investigatory commission in Oxford in 1378 declared that some of Wycliffe’s criticism were not incorrect in se but could be offensive to pious ears.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Describing a doctrine or proposition that is not heretical, but formulated improperly or ambiguously and hence liable to cause scandal. A formal censure."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "Roman Catholicism",
          "Roman Catholicism"
        ],
        [
          "doctrine",
          "doctrine"
        ],
        [
          "proposition",
          "proposition"
        ],
        [
          "heretical",
          "heretical"
        ],
        [
          "formulate",
          "formulate"
        ],
        [
          "improperly",
          "improperly"
        ],
        [
          "ambiguously",
          "ambiguously"
        ],
        [
          "scandal",
          "scandal"
        ],
        [
          "censure",
          "censure#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(Roman Catholicism) Describing a doctrine or proposition that is not heretical, but formulated improperly or ambiguously and hence liable to cause scandal. A formal censure."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "Catholicism",
        "Christianity",
        "Roman-Catholicism"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "offensive to pious ears"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-03 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-05-02 using wiktextract (f4fd8c9 and c9440ce). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.