"non-mechanised" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "non",
        "3": "mechanised"
      },
      "expansion": "non- + mechanised",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From non- + mechanised.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "non-mechanised (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with non-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1960 August, B. Perren, “Resorts for Railfans - 31: March”, in Trains Illustrated, page 486:",
          "text": "Today Whitemoor comprises the Up Yard, the Down Yard and the non-mechanised Norwood Yard on the down side of the main lines.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1964 March, “Coal concentration in Birmingham”, in Modern Railways, page 152:",
          "text": "BR insisted on a throughput of at least 40,000-50,000 tons per depot annually, which meant that block train conveyance of the coal from pit to concentration centre could still be employed, to the extent of at least two trainloads weekly, despite the smaller size of the non-mechanised installations.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not mechanised."
      ],
      "id": "en-non-mechanised-en-adj-KVZ6FtwY",
      "links": [
        [
          "mechanised",
          "mechanised#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(British spelling) Not mechanised."
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "unmechanised"
        }
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "nonmechanized"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "UK",
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "non-mechanised"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "non",
        "3": "mechanised"
      },
      "expansion": "non- + mechanised",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From non- + mechanised.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "non-mechanised (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "unmechanised"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "British English forms",
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English terms prefixed with non-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1960 August, B. Perren, “Resorts for Railfans - 31: March”, in Trains Illustrated, page 486:",
          "text": "Today Whitemoor comprises the Up Yard, the Down Yard and the non-mechanised Norwood Yard on the down side of the main lines.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1964 March, “Coal concentration in Birmingham”, in Modern Railways, page 152:",
          "text": "BR insisted on a throughput of at least 40,000-50,000 tons per depot annually, which meant that block train conveyance of the coal from pit to concentration centre could still be employed, to the extent of at least two trainloads weekly, despite the smaller size of the non-mechanised installations.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not mechanised."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "mechanised",
          "mechanised#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(British spelling) Not mechanised."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "UK",
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "nonmechanized"
    }
  ],
  "word": "non-mechanised"
}