"meshness" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "mesh",
        "3": "ness"
      },
      "expansion": "mesh + -ness",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From mesh + -ness.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "meshness (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ness",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2015 December 19, “Resilience of Self-Organised and Top-Down Planned Cities—A Case Study on London and Beijing Street Networks”, in PLOS ONE, →DOI:",
          "text": "Values of ’meshness’ and ’organic’ (see Analysis section) of the ERPG of are approximately 0.29 and 0.52 when compared to 0.49 and 0.04 for the GRID, suggesting the ERPG is more ‘natural’ than the GRID. Furthermore, values of ‘meshness’ and ‘organic’ for the London and Beijing (see Table 1 ) are compared with those for the ERPG and GRID, showing that meshness values for London and Beijing are lower than for the idealised networks.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The condition of a network resembling a mesh"
      ],
      "id": "en-meshness-en-noun-shK92~XN",
      "links": [
        [
          "network",
          "network"
        ],
        [
          "mesh",
          "mesh"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "meshness"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "mesh",
        "3": "ness"
      },
      "expansion": "mesh + -ness",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From mesh + -ness.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "meshness (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms suffixed with -ness",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2015 December 19, “Resilience of Self-Organised and Top-Down Planned Cities—A Case Study on London and Beijing Street Networks”, in PLOS ONE, →DOI:",
          "text": "Values of ’meshness’ and ’organic’ (see Analysis section) of the ERPG of are approximately 0.29 and 0.52 when compared to 0.49 and 0.04 for the GRID, suggesting the ERPG is more ‘natural’ than the GRID. Furthermore, values of ‘meshness’ and ‘organic’ for the London and Beijing (see Table 1 ) are compared with those for the ERPG and GRID, showing that meshness values for London and Beijing are lower than for the idealised networks.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The condition of a network resembling a mesh"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "network",
          "network"
        ],
        [
          "mesh",
          "mesh"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "meshness"
}