"junk science" meaning in English

See junk science in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Noun

Forms: junk sciences [plural]
Head templates: {{en-noun|~}} junk science (countable and uncountable, plural junk sciences)
  1. (derogatory) Assertions or methods that have the appearance, but not the actuality, of scientific legitimacy. Tags: countable, derogatory, uncountable Categories (topical): Corruption Related terms: pseudoscience

Inflected forms

Download JSON data for junk science meaning in English (2.6kB)

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "junk sciences",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "~"
      },
      "expansion": "junk science (countable and uncountable, plural junk sciences)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with topic categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
          "parents": [
            "Terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Corruption",
          "orig": "en:Corruption",
          "parents": [
            "Crime",
            "Politics",
            "Criminal law",
            "Society",
            "Law",
            "All topics",
            "Justice",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "His testimony was worse than science fiction: it was junk science.",
          "type": "example"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2010, Naomi Oreskes, Erik M. Conway, chapter 5, in Merchants of Doubt",
          "text": "Tom Hockaday was an APCO employee, and March 1993 found him working closely with Philip Morris vice president Ellen Merlo to develop scientific articles to defend secondhand smoke and promote the idea that the EPA work was “junk science.”",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2022 June 9, Matthew Taylor, “Climate policy dragged into culture wars as a ‘delay’ tactic, finds study”, in The Guardian",
          "text": "Climate policy is being dragged into the culture wars with misinformation and junk science being spread across the internet by a relatively small group of individuals and groups, according to a study.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2006, Roger W. Shuy, Linguistics in the Courtroom: A Practical Guide, page 99",
          "text": "Our field falls neither in the category of immediately acceptable DNA experts at one end of the spectrum nor in the category of the immediately unacceptable so-called junk sciences at the other end.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Assertions or methods that have the appearance, but not the actuality, of scientific legitimacy."
      ],
      "id": "en-junk_science-en-noun-4T6b1HJU",
      "links": [
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(derogatory) Assertions or methods that have the appearance, but not the actuality, of scientific legitimacy."
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "pseudoscience"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "countable",
        "derogatory",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "junk science"
}
{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "junk sciences",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "~"
      },
      "expansion": "junk science (countable and uncountable, plural junk sciences)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "pseudoscience"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English derogatory terms",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English terms with usage examples",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Quotation templates to be cleaned",
        "en:Corruption"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "His testimony was worse than science fiction: it was junk science.",
          "type": "example"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2010, Naomi Oreskes, Erik M. Conway, chapter 5, in Merchants of Doubt",
          "text": "Tom Hockaday was an APCO employee, and March 1993 found him working closely with Philip Morris vice president Ellen Merlo to develop scientific articles to defend secondhand smoke and promote the idea that the EPA work was “junk science.”",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2022 June 9, Matthew Taylor, “Climate policy dragged into culture wars as a ‘delay’ tactic, finds study”, in The Guardian",
          "text": "Climate policy is being dragged into the culture wars with misinformation and junk science being spread across the internet by a relatively small group of individuals and groups, according to a study.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2006, Roger W. Shuy, Linguistics in the Courtroom: A Practical Guide, page 99",
          "text": "Our field falls neither in the category of immediately acceptable DNA experts at one end of the spectrum nor in the category of the immediately unacceptable so-called junk sciences at the other end.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Assertions or methods that have the appearance, but not the actuality, of scientific legitimacy."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(derogatory) Assertions or methods that have the appearance, but not the actuality, of scientific legitimacy."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "countable",
        "derogatory",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "junk science"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-03 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-05-02 using wiktextract (f4fd8c9 and c9440ce). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.