See judicial review in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
Download JSON data for judicial review meaning in English (5.2kB)
{
"forms": [
{
"form": "judicial reviews",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "judicial review (plural judicial reviews)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "topical",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Law",
"orig": "en:Law",
"parents": [
"Justice",
"Society",
"All topics",
"Fundamental"
],
"source": "w"
},
{
"_dis": "70 30",
"kind": "other",
"name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
"parents": [
"Entries with incorrect language header",
"Entry maintenance"
],
"source": "w+disamb"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1987 January 2, Irving R. Kaufman, “Opinion: No Way to Interpret the Constitution”, in New York Times, retrieved 2013-10-24",
"text": "Since it appears that judicial review is here to stay, some who remain troubled by it urge that at the very least the enterprise of judges deciding constitutional questions should be limited to discovering the intent of the Framers.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"The doctrine, implemented in varying ways in differing jurisdictions, that authorities within the judicial branch of government may examine and make rulings on the legal validity of decisions and actions of the legislative and executive branches of government and, in some jurisdictions, of others within the judicial branch itself."
],
"id": "en-judicial_review-en-noun-Wb-pUyJM",
"links": [
[
"law",
"law#English"
],
[
"doctrine",
"doctrine"
],
[
"jurisdiction",
"jurisdiction"
],
[
"examine",
"examine"
],
[
"ruling",
"ruling"
],
[
"legal",
"legal"
],
[
"validity",
"validity"
],
[
"legislative",
"legislative"
],
[
"executive",
"executive"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(law, uncountable) The doctrine, implemented in varying ways in differing jurisdictions, that authorities within the judicial branch of government may examine and make rulings on the legal validity of decisions and actions of the legislative and executive branches of government and, in some jurisdictions, of others within the judicial branch itself."
],
"tags": [
"uncountable"
],
"topics": [
"law"
]
},
{
"categories": [
{
"kind": "topical",
"langcode": "en",
"name": "Law",
"orig": "en:Law",
"parents": [
"Justice",
"Society",
"All topics",
"Fundamental"
],
"source": "w"
}
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1906 February 17, “Senate Shied at Rate Vote”, in Lewiston Morning Tribune, Idaho, USA, retrieved 2013-10-24, page 1",
"text": "[T]he senate committee on interstate commerce adjourned until next Thursday without having taken a vote on the bill or considered an amendment for a judicial review of the orders of the interstate commerce commission.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "1988 January 29, Steve Lohr, “British Back Guilt of 6, Upsetting Irish”, in New York Times, retrieved 2013-10-24",
"text": "After one of Britain's most politically sensitive judicial reviews, a three-judge court today upheld the convictions of six men for the murder of 21 people in the bombing of a Birmingham pub in 1974.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2010 November 18, Nick Assinder, “Gitmo Inmates Settlement: Why Britain Decided to Pay”, in Time, retrieved 2013-10-24",
"text": "\"The Obama Administration continues to shield Bush-era torturers from accountability in civil proceedings by blocking judicial review of their illegal behavior,\" said Steven Watt, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"A judicial process undertaken under this doctrine."
],
"id": "en-judicial_review-en-noun-NYiNV5i8",
"links": [
[
"law",
"law#English"
],
[
"process",
"process"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(law, countable) A judicial process undertaken under this doctrine."
],
"tags": [
"countable"
],
"topics": [
"law"
],
"translations": [
{
"_dis1": "24 76",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法審查"
},
{
"_dis1": "24 76",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ shěnchá",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法审查"
},
{
"_dis1": "24 76",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法覆核"
},
{
"_dis1": "24 76",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ fùhé",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法复核"
},
{
"_dis1": "24 76",
"code": "fi",
"lang": "Finnish",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "laillisuusvalvonta"
}
]
}
],
"translations": [
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法審查"
},
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ shěnchá",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法审查"
},
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法覆核"
},
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ fùhé",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法复核"
},
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "fi",
"lang": "Finnish",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "laillisuusvalvonta"
},
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "ru",
"lang": "Russian",
"roman": "sudébnyj nadzór",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "суде́бный надзо́р"
},
{
"_dis1": "51 49",
"code": "ru",
"lang": "Russian",
"roman": "sudébnyj kontrólʹ",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "суде́бный контро́ль"
}
],
"wikipedia": [
"judicial review"
],
"word": "judicial review"
}
{
"categories": [
"English countable nouns",
"English entries with incorrect language header",
"English lemmas",
"English multiword terms",
"English nouns"
],
"forms": [
{
"form": "judicial reviews",
"tags": [
"plural"
]
}
],
"head_templates": [
{
"args": {},
"expansion": "judicial review (plural judicial reviews)",
"name": "en-noun"
}
],
"lang": "English",
"lang_code": "en",
"pos": "noun",
"senses": [
{
"categories": [
"English terms with quotations",
"English uncountable nouns",
"en:Law"
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1987 January 2, Irving R. Kaufman, “Opinion: No Way to Interpret the Constitution”, in New York Times, retrieved 2013-10-24",
"text": "Since it appears that judicial review is here to stay, some who remain troubled by it urge that at the very least the enterprise of judges deciding constitutional questions should be limited to discovering the intent of the Framers.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"The doctrine, implemented in varying ways in differing jurisdictions, that authorities within the judicial branch of government may examine and make rulings on the legal validity of decisions and actions of the legislative and executive branches of government and, in some jurisdictions, of others within the judicial branch itself."
],
"links": [
[
"law",
"law#English"
],
[
"doctrine",
"doctrine"
],
[
"jurisdiction",
"jurisdiction"
],
[
"examine",
"examine"
],
[
"ruling",
"ruling"
],
[
"legal",
"legal"
],
[
"validity",
"validity"
],
[
"legislative",
"legislative"
],
[
"executive",
"executive"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(law, uncountable) The doctrine, implemented in varying ways in differing jurisdictions, that authorities within the judicial branch of government may examine and make rulings on the legal validity of decisions and actions of the legislative and executive branches of government and, in some jurisdictions, of others within the judicial branch itself."
],
"tags": [
"uncountable"
],
"topics": [
"law"
]
},
{
"categories": [
"English countable nouns",
"English terms with quotations",
"en:Law"
],
"examples": [
{
"ref": "1906 February 17, “Senate Shied at Rate Vote”, in Lewiston Morning Tribune, Idaho, USA, retrieved 2013-10-24, page 1",
"text": "[T]he senate committee on interstate commerce adjourned until next Thursday without having taken a vote on the bill or considered an amendment for a judicial review of the orders of the interstate commerce commission.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "1988 January 29, Steve Lohr, “British Back Guilt of 6, Upsetting Irish”, in New York Times, retrieved 2013-10-24",
"text": "After one of Britain's most politically sensitive judicial reviews, a three-judge court today upheld the convictions of six men for the murder of 21 people in the bombing of a Birmingham pub in 1974.",
"type": "quotation"
},
{
"ref": "2010 November 18, Nick Assinder, “Gitmo Inmates Settlement: Why Britain Decided to Pay”, in Time, retrieved 2013-10-24",
"text": "\"The Obama Administration continues to shield Bush-era torturers from accountability in civil proceedings by blocking judicial review of their illegal behavior,\" said Steven Watt, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union.",
"type": "quotation"
}
],
"glosses": [
"A judicial process undertaken under this doctrine."
],
"links": [
[
"law",
"law#English"
],
[
"process",
"process"
]
],
"raw_glosses": [
"(law, countable) A judicial process undertaken under this doctrine."
],
"tags": [
"countable"
],
"topics": [
"law"
]
}
],
"translations": [
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法審查"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ shěnchá",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法审查"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法覆核"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ fùhé",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "司法复核"
},
{
"code": "fi",
"lang": "Finnish",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "laillisuusvalvonta"
},
{
"code": "ru",
"lang": "Russian",
"roman": "sudébnyj nadzór",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "суде́бный надзо́р"
},
{
"code": "ru",
"lang": "Russian",
"roman": "sudébnyj kontrólʹ",
"sense": "doctrine",
"word": "суде́бный контро́ль"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法審查"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ shěnchá",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法审查"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法覆核"
},
{
"code": "cmn",
"lang": "Chinese Mandarin",
"roman": "sīfǎ fùhé",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "司法复核"
},
{
"code": "fi",
"lang": "Finnish",
"sense": "judicial process",
"word": "laillisuusvalvonta"
}
],
"wikipedia": [
"judicial review"
],
"word": "judicial review"
}
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-04-26 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-04-21 using wiktextract (93a6c53 and 21a9316). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.