"hereditarian" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "hereditary",
        "3": "an"
      },
      "expansion": "hereditary + -an",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From hereditary + -an.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "hereditarians",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "hereditarian (plural hereditarians)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "_dis": "51 49",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "49 51",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -an",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "51 49",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "52 48",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "One who advocates hereditarianism."
      ],
      "id": "en-hereditarian-en-noun-p9WP3r9Z",
      "links": [
        [
          "hereditarianism",
          "hereditarianism"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "hereditarian"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "hereditary",
        "3": "an"
      },
      "expansion": "hereditary + -an",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From hereditary + -an.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more hereditarian",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most hereditarian",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "hereditarian (comparative more hereditarian, superlative most hereditarian)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "_dis": "51 49",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "49 51",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -an",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "51 49",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "52 48",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              45,
              57
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "1999, Matt Ridley, Genome, Harper Perennial, published 2004, page 293:",
          "text": "When it reported in 1908, it took a strongly hereditarian view of mental deficiency, which was not surprising given that many of its members were paid-up eugenists.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              193,
              206
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2025 March 13, Dalton Conley, “A New Scientific Field Is Recasting Who We Are and How We Got That Way”, in New York Times:",
          "text": "Since Francis Galton coined the phrase “nature versus nurture” 150 years ago, the debate about what makes us who we are has dominated the human sciences. Do genes determine our destiny, as the hereditarians would say? Or do we enter the world as blank slates, formed only by what we encounter in our homes and beyond? What started as an intellectual debate quickly expanded to whatever anyone wanted it to mean, invoked in arguments about everything from free will to race to inequality to whether public policy can, or should, level the playing field. Today, however, a new realm of science is poised to upend the debate — not by declaring victory for one side or the other, nor even by calling a tie, but rather by revealing they were never in opposition in the first place. Through this new vantage, nature and nurture are not even entirely distinguishable, because genes and environment don’t operate in isolation; they influence each other and to a very real degree even create each other. The new field is called sociogenomics, a fusion of behavioral science and genetics that I have been closely involved with for over a decade. Though the field is still in its infancy, its philosophical implications are staggering. It has the potential to rewrite a great deal of what we think we know about who we are and how we got that way.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Pertaining to hereditarianism."
      ],
      "id": "en-hereditarian-en-adj-I1bE-3iq"
    }
  ],
  "word": "hereditarian"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "English adjectives",
    "English countable nouns",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English terms suffixed with -an",
    "Pages with 1 entry",
    "Pages with entries"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "hereditary",
        "3": "an"
      },
      "expansion": "hereditary + -an",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From hereditary + -an.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "hereditarians",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "hereditarian (plural hereditarians)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "glosses": [
        "One who advocates hereditarianism."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "hereditarianism",
          "hereditarianism"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "hereditarian"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "English adjectives",
    "English countable nouns",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English terms suffixed with -an",
    "Pages with 1 entry",
    "Pages with entries"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "hereditary",
        "3": "an"
      },
      "expansion": "hereditary + -an",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From hereditary + -an.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more hereditarian",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most hereditarian",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "hereditarian (comparative more hereditarian, superlative most hereditarian)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English terms with quotations"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              45,
              57
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "1999, Matt Ridley, Genome, Harper Perennial, published 2004, page 293:",
          "text": "When it reported in 1908, it took a strongly hereditarian view of mental deficiency, which was not surprising given that many of its members were paid-up eugenists.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              193,
              206
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2025 March 13, Dalton Conley, “A New Scientific Field Is Recasting Who We Are and How We Got That Way”, in New York Times:",
          "text": "Since Francis Galton coined the phrase “nature versus nurture” 150 years ago, the debate about what makes us who we are has dominated the human sciences. Do genes determine our destiny, as the hereditarians would say? Or do we enter the world as blank slates, formed only by what we encounter in our homes and beyond? What started as an intellectual debate quickly expanded to whatever anyone wanted it to mean, invoked in arguments about everything from free will to race to inequality to whether public policy can, or should, level the playing field. Today, however, a new realm of science is poised to upend the debate — not by declaring victory for one side or the other, nor even by calling a tie, but rather by revealing they were never in opposition in the first place. Through this new vantage, nature and nurture are not even entirely distinguishable, because genes and environment don’t operate in isolation; they influence each other and to a very real degree even create each other. The new field is called sociogenomics, a fusion of behavioral science and genetics that I have been closely involved with for over a decade. Though the field is still in its infancy, its philosophical implications are staggering. It has the potential to rewrite a great deal of what we think we know about who we are and how we got that way.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Pertaining to hereditarianism."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "hereditarian"
}