"good-bad" meaning in English

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more good-bad",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most good-bad",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "good-bad (comparative more good-bad, superlative most good-bad)",
      "name": "en-adjective"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with language name categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English oxymorons",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
          "parents": [
            "Terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Film",
          "orig": "en:Film",
          "parents": [
            "Entertainment",
            "Mass media",
            "Culture",
            "Media",
            "Society",
            "Communication",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Literature",
          "orig": "en:Literature",
          "parents": [
            "Culture",
            "Entertainment",
            "Writing",
            "Society",
            "Human behaviour",
            "Language",
            "All topics",
            "Human",
            "Communication",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "1945, November 2. George Orwell, \"Good Bad Books\", Tribune, 2 November.\nThe existence of good bad literature--the fact that one can be amused or excited or even moved by a book that one's intellect simply refuses to take seriously--is a reminder that art is not the same thing as cerebration."
        },
        {
          "ref": "2014, Sarah Nilsen, Projecting America, 1958, McFarland",
          "text": "Touch of Evil is not a good movie, but it is a good bad movie, which is more fun than the mediocre or even the adequate.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "text": "2015, July 6, David Fear et al, 25 Best Modern Exploitation Movies. Rolling Stone.\nIs Showgirls good-bad or just bad-bad?"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2019 November 29, Donald Clarke, “The Two Popes: one giant leap of faith”, in The Irish Times",
          "text": "The Shoes of the Fisherman is a good-bad film that owes no duty to history or to what were then current affairs.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling."
      ],
      "id": "en-good-bad-en-adj-Hn8xsTtl",
      "links": [
        [
          "film",
          "film#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "literature",
          "literature"
        ],
        [
          "schlocky",
          "schlocky"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(film, literature) Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "broadcasting",
        "film",
        "literature",
        "media",
        "publishing",
        "television"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "good-bad"
}

{
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more good-bad",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most good-bad",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "good-bad (comparative more good-bad, superlative most good-bad)",
      "name": "en-adjective"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English oxymorons",
        "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "en:Film",
        "en:Literature"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "1945, November 2. George Orwell, \"Good Bad Books\", Tribune, 2 November.\nThe existence of good bad literature--the fact that one can be amused or excited or even moved by a book that one's intellect simply refuses to take seriously--is a reminder that art is not the same thing as cerebration."
        },
        {
          "ref": "2014, Sarah Nilsen, Projecting America, 1958, McFarland",
          "text": "Touch of Evil is not a good movie, but it is a good bad movie, which is more fun than the mediocre or even the adequate.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "text": "2015, July 6, David Fear et al, 25 Best Modern Exploitation Movies. Rolling Stone.\nIs Showgirls good-bad or just bad-bad?"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2019 November 29, Donald Clarke, “The Two Popes: one giant leap of faith”, in The Irish Times",
          "text": "The Shoes of the Fisherman is a good-bad film that owes no duty to history or to what were then current affairs.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "film",
          "film#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "literature",
          "literature"
        ],
        [
          "schlocky",
          "schlocky"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(film, literature) Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling."
      ],
      "topics": [
        "broadcasting",
        "film",
        "literature",
        "media",
        "publishing",
        "television"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "good-bad"
}