See good-bad in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
{ "forms": [ { "form": "more good-bad", "tags": [ "comparative" ] }, { "form": "most good-bad", "tags": [ "superlative" ] } ], "head_templates": [ { "args": {}, "expansion": "good-bad (comparative more good-bad, superlative most good-bad)", "name": "en-adjective" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "adj", "senses": [ { "categories": [ { "kind": "other", "name": "English entries with incorrect language header", "parents": [ "Entries with incorrect language header", "Entry maintenance" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "English oxymorons", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with 1 entry", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with entries", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "topical", "langcode": "en", "name": "Film", "orig": "en:Film", "parents": [ "Entertainment", "Mass media", "Culture", "Media", "Society", "Communication", "All topics", "Fundamental" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "topical", "langcode": "en", "name": "Literature", "orig": "en:Literature", "parents": [ "Culture", "Entertainment", "Writing", "Society", "Human behaviour", "Language", "All topics", "Human", "Communication", "Fundamental" ], "source": "w" } ], "examples": [ { "text": "1945, November 2. George Orwell, \"Good Bad Books\", Tribune, 2 November.\nThe existence of good bad literature--the fact that one can be amused or excited or even moved by a book that one's intellect simply refuses to take seriously--is a reminder that art is not the same thing as cerebration." }, { "ref": "2014, Sarah Nilsen, Projecting America, 1958, McFarland:", "text": "Touch of Evil is not a good movie, but it is a good bad movie, which is more fun than the mediocre or even the adequate.", "type": "quote" }, { "text": "2015, July 6, David Fear et al, 25 Best Modern Exploitation Movies. Rolling Stone.\nIs Showgirls good-bad or just bad-bad?" }, { "ref": "2019 November 29, Donald Clarke, “The Two Popes: one giant leap of faith”, in The Irish Times:", "text": "The Shoes of the Fisherman is a good-bad film that owes no duty to history or to what were then current affairs.", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling." ], "id": "en-good-bad-en-adj-Hn8xsTtl", "links": [ [ "film", "film#Noun" ], [ "literature", "literature" ], [ "schlocky", "schlocky" ] ], "raw_glosses": [ "(film, literature) Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling." ], "topics": [ "broadcasting", "film", "literature", "media", "publishing", "television" ] } ], "word": "good-bad" }
{ "forms": [ { "form": "more good-bad", "tags": [ "comparative" ] }, { "form": "most good-bad", "tags": [ "superlative" ] } ], "head_templates": [ { "args": {}, "expansion": "good-bad (comparative more good-bad, superlative most good-bad)", "name": "en-adjective" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "adj", "senses": [ { "categories": [ "English adjectives", "English entries with incorrect language header", "English lemmas", "English multiword terms", "English oxymorons", "English terms with quotations", "Pages with 1 entry", "Pages with entries", "en:Film", "en:Literature" ], "examples": [ { "text": "1945, November 2. George Orwell, \"Good Bad Books\", Tribune, 2 November.\nThe existence of good bad literature--the fact that one can be amused or excited or even moved by a book that one's intellect simply refuses to take seriously--is a reminder that art is not the same thing as cerebration." }, { "ref": "2014, Sarah Nilsen, Projecting America, 1958, McFarland:", "text": "Touch of Evil is not a good movie, but it is a good bad movie, which is more fun than the mediocre or even the adequate.", "type": "quote" }, { "text": "2015, July 6, David Fear et al, 25 Best Modern Exploitation Movies. Rolling Stone.\nIs Showgirls good-bad or just bad-bad?" }, { "ref": "2019 November 29, Donald Clarke, “The Two Popes: one giant leap of faith”, in The Irish Times:", "text": "The Shoes of the Fisherman is a good-bad film that owes no duty to history or to what were then current affairs.", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling." ], "links": [ [ "film", "film#Noun" ], [ "literature", "literature" ], [ "schlocky", "schlocky" ] ], "raw_glosses": [ "(film, literature) Enjoyably schlocky, poor in quality but nonetheless compelling." ], "topics": [ "broadcasting", "film", "literature", "media", "publishing", "television" ] } ], "word": "good-bad" }
Download raw JSONL data for good-bad meaning in English (1.8kB)
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2025-01-15 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2025-01-01 using wiktextract (b941637 and 4230888). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.