"fancruft" meaning in English

See fancruft in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Noun

Etymology: fan + cruft Etymology templates: {{compound|en|fan|cruft}} fan + cruft Head templates: {{en-noun|-}} fancruft (uncountable)
  1. (Wikimedia jargon, derogatory) Trivial or excessively detailed information on a work of fiction added by fans to a general-interest wiki. Tags: derogatory, uncountable Categories (topical): Wiki, Fandom
    Sense id: en-fancruft-en-noun-D79Hmbko Disambiguation of Fandom: 69 31
  2. (fandom slang, derogatory, less common) Low-quality material (especially literature) produced by fans of a performer, group, author etc. Tags: derogatory, slang, uncommon, uncountable
    Sense id: en-fancruft-en-noun-PqwRe-5h Categories (other): English entries with incorrect language header, English entries with topic categories using raw markup Disambiguation of English entries with incorrect language header: 43 57 Disambiguation of English entries with topic categories using raw markup: 37 63 Topics: lifestyle

Download JSON data for fancruft meaning in English (4.1kB)

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "fan",
        "3": "cruft"
      },
      "expansion": "fan + cruft",
      "name": "compound"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "fan + cruft",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "fancruft (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Wiki",
          "orig": "en:Wiki",
          "parents": [
            "World Wide Web",
            "Internet",
            "Computing",
            "Networking",
            "Technology",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "69 31",
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Fandom",
          "orig": "en:Fandom",
          "parents": [
            "Culture",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "[2008, Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates, How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it, No Starch Press, page 225",
          "text": "Fancruft (sometimes shortened to just cruft) is a derogatory term for these types of articles, which are sometimes just barely tolerated.]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, Jason Mittell, “Wikis and Participatory Fandom”, in Aaron Delwiche, Jennifer Jacobs Henderson, editors, The Participatory Cultures Handbook, Routledge, page 39",
          "text": "This contrast shows how dedicated Star Wars fans use the niche Wookieepedia to create and value content with a vast amount of detail and precision, even if the same content is viewed as fancruft within the more general Wikipedia community.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2014, Michael Restivo, Why Wiki Works: Peer Production and Making Knowledge the Wiki Way (dissertation), Stony Brook University, page 1",
          "text": "Editors are the folks who detect and remove original research and fancruft.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2017, David Letzler, The Cruft of Fiction: Mega-Novels and the Science of Paying Attention, U of Nebraska Press, page 5",
          "text": "Although the term [\"cruft\"] is almost always intended negatively, it is also associated with a certain obsessive attraction, most obviously in the case of \"fancruft,\" those excessively detailed wiki entries about extremely minor elements of some niche subculture.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Trivial or excessively detailed information on a work of fiction added by fans to a general-interest wiki."
      ],
      "id": "en-fancruft-en-noun-D79Hmbko",
      "links": [
        [
          "jargon",
          "jargon"
        ],
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "Trivial",
          "trivial"
        ],
        [
          "excessively",
          "excessively"
        ],
        [
          "detailed",
          "detailed"
        ],
        [
          "work of fiction",
          "work of fiction"
        ],
        [
          "fan",
          "fan"
        ],
        [
          "wiki",
          "wiki"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(Wikimedia jargon, derogatory) Trivial or excessively detailed information on a work of fiction added by fans to a general-interest wiki."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "derogatory",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "taxonomic": "Wikimedia jargon"
    },
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "_dis": "43 57",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "37 63",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with topic categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2019, Suzanne Scott, Fake Geek Girls: Fandom, Gender, and the Convergence Culture Industry, NYU Press, page 137",
          "text": "Here, Talking Dead forwards its own subtle policing strategy, celebrating the moment of canonical coupling in which Richonne is elevated from feminine “fancruft” to a legitimate topic of conversation, simultaneously reveling in and poking fun at Brown's deep emotional investment in coupling.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Low-quality material (especially literature) produced by fans of a performer, group, author etc."
      ],
      "id": "en-fancruft-en-noun-PqwRe-5h",
      "links": [
        [
          "fandom",
          "fandom"
        ],
        [
          "slang",
          "slang"
        ],
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "literature",
          "literature"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(fandom slang, derogatory, less common) Low-quality material (especially literature) produced by fans of a performer, group, author etc."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "derogatory",
        "slang",
        "uncommon",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "lifestyle"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "fancruft"
}
{
  "categories": [
    "English compound terms",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English uncountable nouns",
    "en:Fandom"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "fan",
        "3": "cruft"
      },
      "expansion": "fan + cruft",
      "name": "compound"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "fan + cruft",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "fancruft (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English derogatory terms",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "en:Wiki"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "[2008, Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates, How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it, No Starch Press, page 225",
          "text": "Fancruft (sometimes shortened to just cruft) is a derogatory term for these types of articles, which are sometimes just barely tolerated.]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, Jason Mittell, “Wikis and Participatory Fandom”, in Aaron Delwiche, Jennifer Jacobs Henderson, editors, The Participatory Cultures Handbook, Routledge, page 39",
          "text": "This contrast shows how dedicated Star Wars fans use the niche Wookieepedia to create and value content with a vast amount of detail and precision, even if the same content is viewed as fancruft within the more general Wikipedia community.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2014, Michael Restivo, Why Wiki Works: Peer Production and Making Knowledge the Wiki Way (dissertation), Stony Brook University, page 1",
          "text": "Editors are the folks who detect and remove original research and fancruft.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2017, David Letzler, The Cruft of Fiction: Mega-Novels and the Science of Paying Attention, U of Nebraska Press, page 5",
          "text": "Although the term [\"cruft\"] is almost always intended negatively, it is also associated with a certain obsessive attraction, most obviously in the case of \"fancruft,\" those excessively detailed wiki entries about extremely minor elements of some niche subculture.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Trivial or excessively detailed information on a work of fiction added by fans to a general-interest wiki."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "jargon",
          "jargon"
        ],
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "Trivial",
          "trivial"
        ],
        [
          "excessively",
          "excessively"
        ],
        [
          "detailed",
          "detailed"
        ],
        [
          "work of fiction",
          "work of fiction"
        ],
        [
          "fan",
          "fan"
        ],
        [
          "wiki",
          "wiki"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(Wikimedia jargon, derogatory) Trivial or excessively detailed information on a work of fiction added by fans to a general-interest wiki."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "derogatory",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "taxonomic": "Wikimedia jargon"
    },
    {
      "categories": [
        "English derogatory terms",
        "English fandom slang",
        "English terms with quotations"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2019, Suzanne Scott, Fake Geek Girls: Fandom, Gender, and the Convergence Culture Industry, NYU Press, page 137",
          "text": "Here, Talking Dead forwards its own subtle policing strategy, celebrating the moment of canonical coupling in which Richonne is elevated from feminine “fancruft” to a legitimate topic of conversation, simultaneously reveling in and poking fun at Brown's deep emotional investment in coupling.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Low-quality material (especially literature) produced by fans of a performer, group, author etc."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "fandom",
          "fandom"
        ],
        [
          "slang",
          "slang"
        ],
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "literature",
          "literature"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(fandom slang, derogatory, less common) Low-quality material (especially literature) produced by fans of a performer, group, author etc."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "derogatory",
        "slang",
        "uncommon",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "lifestyle"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "fancruft"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-01 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-04-21 using wiktextract (f4fd8c9 and c9440ce). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.