"experientable" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "",
        "3": "-able"
      },
      "expansion": "+ -able",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "experient- (stem of experience, experiential) + -able",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "experientable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -able",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1968, Catholic Anthropological Conference, Anthropological Quarterly, Catholic University of America Press, page 36",
          "text": "…Carnap which focuses upon how the sensation is given and upon sense-data, the most basic observable experientable unit and (2) the concept of the given of the Ordinary Language School and especially L. Wittgenstein and P. Winch who focus more upon…",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1994: Howard Robinson, Perception, page 126 (Routledge; →ISBN, 978‒0415033640)",
          "text": "This is a travesty of the idea of a quale. If the term qualia has any use at all it is to designate experientable differences; significantly different qualia can, in principle, be recognised as different. The point is not purely verbal."
        },
        {
          "text": "2000: “leonardo dasso”, alt.talk.creationism: What % of evolutionists here are not athiests?, the 2ⁿᵈ day of October at 8 o’clock a.m.\nOnce you start refering to observable, experientable entities, you are in the realm of the empirical, and therefore, these entities can become the subject of scientific research."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Capable of being experienced."
      ],
      "id": "en-experientable-en-adj-aNyTmvzO",
      "links": [
        [
          "Capable",
          "capable"
        ],
        [
          "experience",
          "experience"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sounds": [
    {
      "ipa": "/ɛksˌpɪəɹɪˈɛntəbl/",
      "tags": [
        "Received-Pronunciation"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "experientable"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "",
        "3": "-able"
      },
      "expansion": "+ -able",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "experient- (stem of experience, experiential) + -able",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "experientable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English 5-syllable words",
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -able",
        "English terms with IPA pronunciation",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1968, Catholic Anthropological Conference, Anthropological Quarterly, Catholic University of America Press, page 36",
          "text": "…Carnap which focuses upon how the sensation is given and upon sense-data, the most basic observable experientable unit and (2) the concept of the given of the Ordinary Language School and especially L. Wittgenstein and P. Winch who focus more upon…",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1994: Howard Robinson, Perception, page 126 (Routledge; →ISBN, 978‒0415033640)",
          "text": "This is a travesty of the idea of a quale. If the term qualia has any use at all it is to designate experientable differences; significantly different qualia can, in principle, be recognised as different. The point is not purely verbal."
        },
        {
          "text": "2000: “leonardo dasso”, alt.talk.creationism: What % of evolutionists here are not athiests?, the 2ⁿᵈ day of October at 8 o’clock a.m.\nOnce you start refering to observable, experientable entities, you are in the realm of the empirical, and therefore, these entities can become the subject of scientific research."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Capable of being experienced."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "Capable",
          "capable"
        ],
        [
          "experience",
          "experience"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sounds": [
    {
      "ipa": "/ɛksˌpɪəɹɪˈɛntəbl/",
      "tags": [
        "Received-Pronunciation"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "experientable"
}