"designerless" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "designer",
        "3": "less"
      },
      "expansion": "designer + -less",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From designer + -less.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "designerless (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -less",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2001, Senyo B-S. K. Adjibolosoo, Portraits of human behavior and performance: the human factor in action, page 60:",
          "text": "While Wilson and Dawkins maybe^([sic]) the favorite examples of the devil incarnate for those who would not accept the designerless universe they depict, it is their perspective that lies at the foundation of most modern professions.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2003, Rudy VanderLans, Rant, page 66:",
          "text": "The style of no style has to look designerless. No self to express, no showy demonstration of technical craft or expertise.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Without a designer."
      ],
      "id": "en-designerless-en-adj-ZyJ96OpR",
      "links": [
        [
          "designer",
          "designer"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "designerless"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "designer",
        "3": "less"
      },
      "expansion": "designer + -less",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From designer + -less.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "designerless (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -less",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "Quotation templates to be cleaned"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2001, Senyo B-S. K. Adjibolosoo, Portraits of human behavior and performance: the human factor in action, page 60:",
          "text": "While Wilson and Dawkins maybe^([sic]) the favorite examples of the devil incarnate for those who would not accept the designerless universe they depict, it is their perspective that lies at the foundation of most modern professions.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2003, Rudy VanderLans, Rant, page 66:",
          "text": "The style of no style has to look designerless. No self to express, no showy demonstration of technical craft or expertise.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Without a designer."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "designer",
          "designer"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "designerless"
}