"comeronymous" meaning in English

See comeronymous in All languages combined, or Wiktionary

Adjective

Etymology: From co- + meronymous or comeronym + -ous. Etymology templates: {{af|en|co-|meronymous}} co- + meronymous, {{af|en|comeronym|-ous}} comeronym + -ous Head templates: {{en-adj|-}} comeronymous (not comparable)
  1. Being or relating to comeronyms (names for fellow parts of the same whole). Tags: not-comparable Categories (topical): Semantics Synonyms: comeronymic Coordinate_terms: autohyponymic, autohyponymous, cohyponymic, cohyponymous, hyponymic, hyponymous, More: see Wiktionary:Semantic relations

Download JSON data for comeronymous meaning in English (3.3kB)

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "co-",
        "3": "meronymous"
      },
      "expansion": "co- + meronymous",
      "name": "af"
    },
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "comeronym",
        "3": "-ous"
      },
      "expansion": "comeronym + -ous",
      "name": "af"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From co- + meronymous or comeronym + -ous.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "comeronymous (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with topic categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with co-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ous",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Semantics",
          "orig": "en:Semantics",
          "parents": [
            "Linguistics",
            "Language",
            "Social sciences",
            "Communication",
            "Sciences",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "coordinate_terms": [
        {
          "word": "autohyponymic"
        },
        {
          "word": "autohyponymous"
        },
        {
          "word": "cohyponymic"
        },
        {
          "word": "cohyponymous"
        },
        {
          "word": "hyponymic"
        },
        {
          "word": "hyponymous"
        },
        {
          "word": "More: see Wiktionary:Semantic relations"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2000 July, Bernard J. McKenna, Philip Graham, “Technocratic Discourse: A Primer”, in Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, volume 30, number 3, →DOI, page 242",
          "text": "The co-meronymous elements that compose the driving factors are technology, the related mobility of people, goods and ideas, and a liberal trading environment. Each of these co-meronymous nominals is devoid of human agency.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2005, Philip Windridge, Bernadette Sharp, Geoff Thompson, “Symbolic Knowledge Representation in Transcript Based Taxonomies”, in Chin-Sheng Chen, Joaquim Filipe, Isabel Seruca, José Cordeiro, editors, ICEIS 2005: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, volume 2, SciTePress, →DOI, page 268",
          "text": "The meronymy relation can be understood as the part-of relation. For example, in Figure 1b ‘set of activities’, ‘deliverables’ and ‘milestones’ have been analysed as being part-of ‘project management’ and therefore in a co-meronymous relation to each other.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2013, Aleš Klégr, “The limits of polysemy: enantiosemy”, in Linguistica Pragensia, volume 23, number 2, Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts, page 21",
          "text": "[…] the question arises whether the other form of the exclusion relationship, comeronymy, could not be found among polysemes as well. There is no mention of this possibility in the literature but, as there is no logical obstacle to comeronymous polysemes, this hypothesis could be worth exploring.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Being or relating to comeronyms (names for fellow parts of the same whole)."
      ],
      "id": "en-comeronymous-en-adj-QMmYBNuL",
      "links": [
        [
          "comeronym",
          "comeronym"
        ],
        [
          "parts",
          "part#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "whole",
          "whole#Noun"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "comeronymic"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "comeronymous"
}
{
  "coordinate_terms": [
    {
      "word": "autohyponymic"
    },
    {
      "word": "autohyponymous"
    },
    {
      "word": "cohyponymic"
    },
    {
      "word": "cohyponymous"
    },
    {
      "word": "hyponymic"
    },
    {
      "word": "hyponymous"
    },
    {
      "word": "More: see Wiktionary:Semantic relations"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "co-",
        "3": "meronymous"
      },
      "expansion": "co- + meronymous",
      "name": "af"
    },
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "comeronym",
        "3": "-ous"
      },
      "expansion": "comeronym + -ous",
      "name": "af"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From co- + meronymous or comeronym + -ous.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "comeronymous (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English entries with topic categories using raw markup",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with co-",
        "English terms suffixed with -ous",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "en:Semantics"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2000 July, Bernard J. McKenna, Philip Graham, “Technocratic Discourse: A Primer”, in Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, volume 30, number 3, →DOI, page 242",
          "text": "The co-meronymous elements that compose the driving factors are technology, the related mobility of people, goods and ideas, and a liberal trading environment. Each of these co-meronymous nominals is devoid of human agency.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2005, Philip Windridge, Bernadette Sharp, Geoff Thompson, “Symbolic Knowledge Representation in Transcript Based Taxonomies”, in Chin-Sheng Chen, Joaquim Filipe, Isabel Seruca, José Cordeiro, editors, ICEIS 2005: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, volume 2, SciTePress, →DOI, page 268",
          "text": "The meronymy relation can be understood as the part-of relation. For example, in Figure 1b ‘set of activities’, ‘deliverables’ and ‘milestones’ have been analysed as being part-of ‘project management’ and therefore in a co-meronymous relation to each other.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2013, Aleš Klégr, “The limits of polysemy: enantiosemy”, in Linguistica Pragensia, volume 23, number 2, Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts, page 21",
          "text": "[…] the question arises whether the other form of the exclusion relationship, comeronymy, could not be found among polysemes as well. There is no mention of this possibility in the literature but, as there is no logical obstacle to comeronymous polysemes, this hypothesis could be worth exploring.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Being or relating to comeronyms (names for fellow parts of the same whole)."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "comeronym",
          "comeronym"
        ],
        [
          "parts",
          "part#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "whole",
          "whole#Noun"
        ]
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "comeronymic"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "comeronymous"
}

This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-05-01 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-04-21 using wiktextract (f4fd8c9 and c9440ce). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.