See battlecarrier in All languages combined, or Wiktionary
{ "forms": [ { "form": "battlecarriers", "tags": [ "plural" ] } ], "head_templates": [ { "args": {}, "expansion": "battlecarrier (plural battlecarriers)", "name": "en-noun" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "noun", "senses": [ { "categories": [ { "kind": "other", "name": "English entries with incorrect language header", "parents": [ "Entries with incorrect language header", "Entry maintenance" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with 1 entry", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "other", "name": "Pages with entries", "parents": [], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "topical", "langcode": "en", "name": "Military", "orig": "en:Military", "parents": [ "Society", "All topics", "Fundamental" ], "source": "w" }, { "kind": "topical", "langcode": "en", "name": "Nautical", "orig": "en:Nautical", "parents": [ "Transport", "All topics", "Fundamental" ], "source": "w" } ], "examples": [ { "ref": "2022 February 9, Drachinifel, 16:39 from the start, in Naval Engineering Disasters - How not to design a ship, archived from the original on 2022-09-25:", "text": "The larger issue is why are you doing this? If you are going to have a battlecarrier that's acting as your combat air patrol provider, that would suggest that your own carriers either can't provide it, or, you need to load your fleet carriers with as many strike aircraft as possible to hit the enemy as hard as possible, which means you're offloading the fighter duties to another ship. Which then raises the question of why are you doing that, and the only real answer for why you would do that instead of having a dedicated battleship and a dedicated aircraft carrier or two is that you're horribly outnumbered and you're looking to eke every last margin out of your fleet. And if you're that desperate, you have much, much larger issues to address than could possibly ever be solved by a battlecarrier carrying a squadron or two of fighters.", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "A hybrid between a battleship and an aircraft carrier, with both one or more heavy gun turrets and a large aircraft hangar and flight deck." ], "id": "en-battlecarrier-en-noun-ksrpIe1l", "links": [ [ "military", "military" ], [ "nautical", "nautical" ], [ "hybrid", "hybrid" ], [ "battleship", "battleship" ], [ "aircraft carrier", "aircraft carrier" ], [ "gun", "gun" ], [ "turret", "turret" ], [ "aircraft", "aircraft" ], [ "hangar", "hangar" ], [ "flight deck", "flight deck" ] ], "raw_glosses": [ "(military, nautical, historical) A hybrid between a battleship and an aircraft carrier, with both one or more heavy gun turrets and a large aircraft hangar and flight deck." ], "tags": [ "historical" ], "topics": [ "government", "military", "nautical", "politics", "transport", "war" ], "wikipedia": [ "Japanese battleship Ise", "battlecarrier" ] } ], "word": "battlecarrier" }
{ "forms": [ { "form": "battlecarriers", "tags": [ "plural" ] } ], "head_templates": [ { "args": {}, "expansion": "battlecarrier (plural battlecarriers)", "name": "en-noun" } ], "lang": "English", "lang_code": "en", "pos": "noun", "senses": [ { "categories": [ "English countable nouns", "English entries with incorrect language header", "English lemmas", "English nouns", "English terms with historical senses", "English terms with quotations", "Pages with 1 entry", "Pages with entries", "en:Military", "en:Nautical" ], "examples": [ { "ref": "2022 February 9, Drachinifel, 16:39 from the start, in Naval Engineering Disasters - How not to design a ship, archived from the original on 2022-09-25:", "text": "The larger issue is why are you doing this? If you are going to have a battlecarrier that's acting as your combat air patrol provider, that would suggest that your own carriers either can't provide it, or, you need to load your fleet carriers with as many strike aircraft as possible to hit the enemy as hard as possible, which means you're offloading the fighter duties to another ship. Which then raises the question of why are you doing that, and the only real answer for why you would do that instead of having a dedicated battleship and a dedicated aircraft carrier or two is that you're horribly outnumbered and you're looking to eke every last margin out of your fleet. And if you're that desperate, you have much, much larger issues to address than could possibly ever be solved by a battlecarrier carrying a squadron or two of fighters.", "type": "quote" } ], "glosses": [ "A hybrid between a battleship and an aircraft carrier, with both one or more heavy gun turrets and a large aircraft hangar and flight deck." ], "links": [ [ "military", "military" ], [ "nautical", "nautical" ], [ "hybrid", "hybrid" ], [ "battleship", "battleship" ], [ "aircraft carrier", "aircraft carrier" ], [ "gun", "gun" ], [ "turret", "turret" ], [ "aircraft", "aircraft" ], [ "hangar", "hangar" ], [ "flight deck", "flight deck" ] ], "raw_glosses": [ "(military, nautical, historical) A hybrid between a battleship and an aircraft carrier, with both one or more heavy gun turrets and a large aircraft hangar and flight deck." ], "tags": [ "historical" ], "topics": [ "government", "military", "nautical", "politics", "transport", "war" ], "wikipedia": [ "Japanese battleship Ise", "battlecarrier" ] } ], "word": "battlecarrier" }
Download raw JSONL data for battlecarrier meaning in English (2.3kB)
This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable English dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-12-08 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-12-04 using wiktextract (bb46d54 and 0c3c9f6). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.
If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.