"banalysis" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "banal",
        "3": "analysis"
      },
      "expansion": "Blend of banal + analysis",
      "name": "blend"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Blend of banal + analysis.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "banalysis (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English blends",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2006 January, Steven A. Walton, “The Field and the Forge: Population, Production, and Power in the Pre-industrial West [book review]”, in Technology and Culture, volume 47, number 1, Baltimore, M.D.: Johns Hopkins University Press, →ISSN, →OCLC, pages 179–180",
          "text": "This \"banalysis\" is not incorrect; it is usually quite well written and relies on the standard summary works in relevant fields, but it seems that one would not be reading this book if one did not already know these general outlines.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2010, Sid Lowe, “Schumacher's Hierarchy”, in Managing in Changing Times: A Guide for the Perplexed Manager, Los Angeles, C.A. […]: Response Books, page 29",
          "text": "[Richard] Whittington is highly critical of the hegemony of the 'classical' school in strategy, characterised by an addiction to 'banalysis'. The implication is that strategists need to be aware of different lenses and be competent and pragmatic in their contextual use.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Trivial and uninsightful analysis."
      ],
      "id": "en-banalysis-en-noun-ClZW~RgG",
      "links": [
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "humorous",
          "humorous"
        ],
        [
          "Trivial",
          "trivial#Adjective"
        ],
        [
          "uninsightful",
          "uninsightful#Adjective"
        ],
        [
          "analysis",
          "analysis#Noun"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(informal, derogatory, humorous) Trivial and uninsightful analysis."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "derogatory",
        "humorous",
        "informal",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "banalysis"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "banal",
        "3": "analysis"
      },
      "expansion": "Blend of banal + analysis",
      "name": "blend"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "Blend of banal + analysis.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "banalysis (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English blends",
        "English derogatory terms",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English humorous terms",
        "English informal terms",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2006 January, Steven A. Walton, “The Field and the Forge: Population, Production, and Power in the Pre-industrial West [book review]”, in Technology and Culture, volume 47, number 1, Baltimore, M.D.: Johns Hopkins University Press, →ISSN, →OCLC, pages 179–180",
          "text": "This \"banalysis\" is not incorrect; it is usually quite well written and relies on the standard summary works in relevant fields, but it seems that one would not be reading this book if one did not already know these general outlines.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2010, Sid Lowe, “Schumacher's Hierarchy”, in Managing in Changing Times: A Guide for the Perplexed Manager, Los Angeles, C.A. […]: Response Books, page 29",
          "text": "[Richard] Whittington is highly critical of the hegemony of the 'classical' school in strategy, characterised by an addiction to 'banalysis'. The implication is that strategists need to be aware of different lenses and be competent and pragmatic in their contextual use.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Trivial and uninsightful analysis."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "derogatory",
          "derogatory"
        ],
        [
          "humorous",
          "humorous"
        ],
        [
          "Trivial",
          "trivial#Adjective"
        ],
        [
          "uninsightful",
          "uninsightful#Adjective"
        ],
        [
          "analysis",
          "analysis#Noun"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(informal, derogatory, humorous) Trivial and uninsightful analysis."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "derogatory",
        "humorous",
        "informal",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "banalysis"
}