"Schumpeteresque" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "Schumpeter",
        "3": "esque"
      },
      "expansion": "Schumpeter + -esque",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Schumpeter + -esque.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more Schumpeteresque",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most Schumpeteresque",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Schumpeteresque (comparative more Schumpeteresque, superlative most Schumpeteresque)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -esque",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2020, Marcus Gilroy-Ware, After the Fact?, Repeater, →ISBN:",
          "text": "More than the much-remarked squeeze on working-class jobs in areas of the economy such as manufacturing, [Edward] Luttwak saw an accelerated “creative destruction” affecting clerical jobs in white-collar data-heavy industries such as banking that were being disrupted by capital's “Schumpeteresque” technology-assisted modernisation as they were digitised.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Schumpeterian"
      ],
      "id": "en-Schumpeteresque-en-adj--zUPaewv",
      "links": [
        [
          "Schumpeterian",
          "Schumpeterian"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Schumpeteresque"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "Schumpeter",
        "3": "esque"
      },
      "expansion": "Schumpeter + -esque",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Schumpeter + -esque.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more Schumpeteresque",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most Schumpeteresque",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Schumpeteresque (comparative more Schumpeteresque, superlative most Schumpeteresque)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English eponyms",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -esque",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2020, Marcus Gilroy-Ware, After the Fact?, Repeater, →ISBN:",
          "text": "More than the much-remarked squeeze on working-class jobs in areas of the economy such as manufacturing, [Edward] Luttwak saw an accelerated “creative destruction” affecting clerical jobs in white-collar data-heavy industries such as banking that were being disrupted by capital's “Schumpeteresque” technology-assisted modernisation as they were digitised.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Schumpeterian"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "Schumpeterian",
          "Schumpeterian"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Schumpeteresque"
}