"Neo-Punic" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "neo-",
        "3": "Punic"
      },
      "expansion": "neo- + Punic",
      "name": "af"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From neo- + Punic.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more Neo-Punic",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most Neo-Punic",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Neo-Punic (comparative more Neo-Punic, superlative most Neo-Punic)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with neo-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              255,
              264
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2025, Cid Swanenvleugel, The Pre-Roman Elements of the Sardinian Lexicon, page 394:",
          "text": "The relative isolation of the Punic speech community in Sardinia from the rest of the Punic-speaking world is demonstrated by a monolingual Punic inscription from the late 2ⁿᵈ or early 3ʳᵈ c. CE in Bitia, which still uses the Punic script rather than the Neo-Punic script that had emerged elsewhere.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Relating to the Punic language as it existed after the fall of Carthage in 146 BCE."
      ],
      "id": "en-Neo-Punic-en-adj-QYzA5YV3"
    }
  ],
  "word": "Neo-Punic"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "neo-",
        "3": "Punic"
      },
      "expansion": "neo- + Punic",
      "name": "af"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From neo- + Punic.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "more Neo-Punic",
      "tags": [
        "comparative"
      ]
    },
    {
      "form": "most Neo-Punic",
      "tags": [
        "superlative"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "Neo-Punic (comparative more Neo-Punic, superlative most Neo-Punic)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English terms prefixed with neo-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              255,
              264
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2025, Cid Swanenvleugel, The Pre-Roman Elements of the Sardinian Lexicon, page 394:",
          "text": "The relative isolation of the Punic speech community in Sardinia from the rest of the Punic-speaking world is demonstrated by a monolingual Punic inscription from the late 2ⁿᵈ or early 3ʳᵈ c. CE in Bitia, which still uses the Punic script rather than the Neo-Punic script that had emerged elsewhere.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Relating to the Punic language as it existed after the fall of Carthage in 146 BCE."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "Neo-Punic"
}