"who knew" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "phrase",
        "head": "who knew?"
      },
      "expansion": "who knew?",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "phrase",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with language name categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "name": "English rhetorical questions",
          "parents": [
            "Rhetorical questions",
            "Idioms",
            "Questions",
            "Sentences",
            "Figures of speech",
            "Multiword terms",
            "Terms by semantic function",
            "Rhetoric",
            "Lemmas",
            "Language",
            "Communication",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
          "parents": [
            "Terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1999, The New York Times Biographical Service, volume 30, page 1518",
          "text": "[…] on at least a dozen occasions, the Supreme Court itself […] had spent the last three decades scrutinizing and parsing, expanding and restricting and harmonizing and distinguishing a decision that had been null and void all along. Who knew!",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2023 October 3, Stuart Heritage, “Mean Girls in 23 parts: the rise of movies and shows watched on TikTok”, in The Guardian, →ISSN",
          "text": "And over the course of a couple of days, albeit in a disjointed and non-linear manner, I had basically watched all of What Women Want. It’s a good film! Sarah Paulson is in it! Who knew?",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Expressing surprise, or ironic lack of surprise, upon learning something."
      ],
      "id": "en-who_knew-en-phrase-~LYk-h98",
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "who would have thunk it"
        },
        {
          "word": "who knows?"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "who knew"
}

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "phrase",
        "head": "who knew?"
      },
      "expansion": "who knew?",
      "name": "head"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "phrase",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "who would have thunk it"
    },
    {
      "word": "who knows?"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English phrases",
        "English rhetorical questions",
        "English terms with non-redundant non-automated sortkeys",
        "English terms with quotations"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1999, The New York Times Biographical Service, volume 30, page 1518",
          "text": "[…] on at least a dozen occasions, the Supreme Court itself […] had spent the last three decades scrutinizing and parsing, expanding and restricting and harmonizing and distinguishing a decision that had been null and void all along. Who knew!",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2023 October 3, Stuart Heritage, “Mean Girls in 23 parts: the rise of movies and shows watched on TikTok”, in The Guardian, →ISSN",
          "text": "And over the course of a couple of days, albeit in a disjointed and non-linear manner, I had basically watched all of What Women Want. It’s a good film! Sarah Paulson is in it! Who knew?",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Expressing surprise, or ironic lack of surprise, upon learning something."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "who knew"
}