"uncopyrightable" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "un",
        "3": "copyrightable"
      },
      "expansion": "un- + copyrightable",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "un- + copyrightable",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "uncopyrightable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Copyright",
          "orig": "en:Copyright",
          "parents": [
            "Intellectual property",
            "Law",
            "Justice",
            "Society",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "62 38",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "70 30",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with language name categories using raw markup",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        },
        {
          "_dis": "61 39",
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with un-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w+disamb"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1984, MJ Touponse, “Application of Copyright Law to Computer Operating System Programs: Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin”, in Connecticut Law Review, page 665",
          "text": "[…] The four criteria that Congress, courts, and theorists have traditionally employed to distinguish the copyrightable from the uncopyrightable are: […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1994, R VerSteeg, “Jurimetric Copyright: Future Shock for the Visual Arts”, in Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, page 125",
          "text": "[…] Keeton, however, resolved that it was the idea/expression dichotomy that forms the boundary line between the copyrightable and the uncopyrightable, […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2001, R Amanda, “Elvis Karaoke Shakespeare and the Search for a Copyrightable Stage Directions”, in Arizona Law Review, page 677",
          "text": "[…] to examine those director contributions that help create that overall feel and apply Judge Hand's abstractions test to filter out the uncopyrightable from the copyrightable […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Ineligible for copyright."
      ],
      "id": "en-uncopyrightable-en-adj-fWSpCOkQ",
      "links": [
        [
          "copyright",
          "copyright"
        ],
        [
          "law",
          "law"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(copyright law) Ineligible for copyright."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "copyright",
        "intellectual-property",
        "law"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "wikipedia": [
    "copyright"
  ],
  "word": "uncopyrightable"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "un",
        "3": "copyrightable"
      },
      "expansion": "un- + copyrightable",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "un- + copyrightable",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "uncopyrightables",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "uncopyrightable (plural uncopyrightables)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "1960 March, W. J. G., H. K. S., “‘Copyright’ Protection for Uncopyrightables: The Common-Law Doctrines”, in University of Pennsylvania Law Review, volume 108, number 5, pages 699–734:",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1969 January, Paul Goldstein, “Federal System Ordering of the Copyright Interest”, in Columbia Law Review, volume 69, number 1, Columbia Law Review Association, Inc., page 71",
          "text": "Intrinsic state doctrines are further condemned by Sears and Compco’s second principle for their tendency to extend the equivalent of copyright protection to statutory uncopyrightables.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "text": "1974 April, Dane J. Durham, “Goldstein v. California: Validity of State Copyright under the Copyright and Supremacy Clauses”, in Hastings Law Journal volume 25 (1973–4), page 1201,\nIndeed, Judge Hand himself admitted that the harshness of a complete denial of protection for statutory uncopyrightables was a persuasive element in the alternative line of thought."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "That for which no one can obtain copyright."
      ],
      "id": "en-uncopyrightable-en-noun-fseleAQd",
      "links": [
        [
          "copyright",
          "copyright"
        ]
      ],
      "related": [
        {
          "word": "List of English isograms"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "wikipedia": [
    "copyright"
  ],
  "word": "uncopyrightable"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "English adjectives",
    "English autological terms",
    "English countable nouns",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English terms prefixed with un-",
    "English uncomparable adjectives"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "un",
        "3": "copyrightable"
      },
      "expansion": "un- + copyrightable",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "un- + copyrightable",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "uncopyrightable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English terms with quotations",
        "Quotation templates to be cleaned",
        "en:Copyright"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1984, MJ Touponse, “Application of Copyright Law to Computer Operating System Programs: Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin”, in Connecticut Law Review, page 665",
          "text": "[…] The four criteria that Congress, courts, and theorists have traditionally employed to distinguish the copyrightable from the uncopyrightable are: […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1994, R VerSteeg, “Jurimetric Copyright: Future Shock for the Visual Arts”, in Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, page 125",
          "text": "[…] Keeton, however, resolved that it was the idea/expression dichotomy that forms the boundary line between the copyrightable and the uncopyrightable, […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2001, R Amanda, “Elvis Karaoke Shakespeare and the Search for a Copyrightable Stage Directions”, in Arizona Law Review, page 677",
          "text": "[…] to examine those director contributions that help create that overall feel and apply Judge Hand's abstractions test to filter out the uncopyrightable from the copyrightable […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Ineligible for copyright."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "copyright",
          "copyright"
        ],
        [
          "law",
          "law"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(copyright law) Ineligible for copyright."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "copyright",
        "intellectual-property",
        "law"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "wikipedia": [
    "copyright"
  ],
  "word": "uncopyrightable"
}

{
  "categories": [
    "English adjectives",
    "English autological terms",
    "English countable nouns",
    "English entries with incorrect language header",
    "English entries with language name categories using raw markup",
    "English lemmas",
    "English nouns",
    "English terms prefixed with un-",
    "English uncomparable adjectives"
  ],
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "un",
        "3": "copyrightable"
      },
      "expansion": "un- + copyrightable",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "un- + copyrightable",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "uncopyrightables",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {},
      "expansion": "uncopyrightable (plural uncopyrightables)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "related": [
    {
      "word": "List of English isograms"
    }
  ],
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English terms with quotations"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "text": "1960 March, W. J. G., H. K. S., “‘Copyright’ Protection for Uncopyrightables: The Common-Law Doctrines”, in University of Pennsylvania Law Review, volume 108, number 5, pages 699–734:",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1969 January, Paul Goldstein, “Federal System Ordering of the Copyright Interest”, in Columbia Law Review, volume 69, number 1, Columbia Law Review Association, Inc., page 71",
          "text": "Intrinsic state doctrines are further condemned by Sears and Compco’s second principle for their tendency to extend the equivalent of copyright protection to statutory uncopyrightables.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "text": "1974 April, Dane J. Durham, “Goldstein v. California: Validity of State Copyright under the Copyright and Supremacy Clauses”, in Hastings Law Journal volume 25 (1973–4), page 1201,\nIndeed, Judge Hand himself admitted that the harshness of a complete denial of protection for statutory uncopyrightables was a persuasive element in the alternative line of thought."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "That for which no one can obtain copyright."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "copyright",
          "copyright"
        ]
      ]
    }
  ],
  "wikipedia": [
    "copyright"
  ],
  "word": "uncopyrightable"
}