"unattestability" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "unattestability (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1964, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, page 19:",
          "text": "The unattestability of an alternative pronunciation [[…]] for disburse might at first sight be ascribed to the presence of /b/ rather than /g/ or /d/ after /s/.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1976, Gloria Sheintuch, “On the Gradation of Grammatical Relations”, in Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, volume 6, number 1, Urbana, Ill.: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, page 187:",
          "text": "Thus the gradation of the direct object provides an explanation for the unattestability of [ +derived / -specific ] direct objects in the language.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1984, D[onald] Terence Langendoen, Paul Martin Postal, The Vastness of Natural Languages, Basil Blackwell, published 1985, →ISBN, pages 39 (Sentence Size Bounds) and 158 (The Characterization of Transfinite Sentences):",
          "text": "Moreover, there is no reason for excluding them from L other than their size-determined and creature-dependent unattestability which would not equally justify excluding any sentence at all from L.[…]Thus no linguist can ignore transfinite sentences on the grounds of their unattestability without equally ignoring almost all finite sentences.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The property of being unattestable."
      ],
      "id": "en-unattestability-en-noun-wswbXpu9",
      "links": [
        [
          "unattestable",
          "unattestable"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(rare) The property of being unattestable."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "rare",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "unattestability"
}

{
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "unattestability (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English terms with rare senses",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1964, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, page 19:",
          "text": "The unattestability of an alternative pronunciation [[…]] for disburse might at first sight be ascribed to the presence of /b/ rather than /g/ or /d/ after /s/.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1976, Gloria Sheintuch, “On the Gradation of Grammatical Relations”, in Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, volume 6, number 1, Urbana, Ill.: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, page 187:",
          "text": "Thus the gradation of the direct object provides an explanation for the unattestability of [ +derived / -specific ] direct objects in the language.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1984, D[onald] Terence Langendoen, Paul Martin Postal, The Vastness of Natural Languages, Basil Blackwell, published 1985, →ISBN, pages 39 (Sentence Size Bounds) and 158 (The Characterization of Transfinite Sentences):",
          "text": "Moreover, there is no reason for excluding them from L other than their size-determined and creature-dependent unattestability which would not equally justify excluding any sentence at all from L.[…]Thus no linguist can ignore transfinite sentences on the grounds of their unattestability without equally ignoring almost all finite sentences.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The property of being unattestable."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "unattestable",
          "unattestable"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(rare) The property of being unattestable."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "rare",
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "unattestability"
}