"templatizable" meaning in All languages combined

See templatizable on Wiktionary

Adjective [English]

Etymology: From templatize + -able. Etymology templates: {{suffix|en|templatize|able}} templatize + -able Head templates: {{en-adj|-}} templatizable (not comparable)
  1. (computing, rare) Able to be templatized. Tags: not-comparable, rare Categories (topical): Computing
{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "templatize",
        "3": "able"
      },
      "expansion": "templatize + -able",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From templatize + -able.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "templatizable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -able",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Computing",
          "orig": "en:Computing",
          "parents": [
            "Technology",
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1998 September 21, John Potter, \"Re: operator+(C c1, const C& c2)\", in comp.lang.c++.moderated, Usenet",
          "text": "They are equally templatizable and inlinable."
        },
        {
          "ref": "2006 August 22, The Ghost In The Machine, “Re: Java FACT ?”, in comp.lang.java.advocacy (Usenet)",
          "text": "Closures would be reassignable and templatizable, and of course used as values, leading to some ugly syntax without typedefs, but one could contemplate something along the following lines: […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2006 December 17, \"The Ghost In The Machine\" (username), \"Re: Goto's labels makes code _Tons_ more readable ( and lest nested ).\", in sci.physics and alt.usenet.kooks, Usenet",
          "text": "One can also split the problem into pieces, which gets kind of ugly in C, but might be templatizable in C++: […]"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2007 January 22, \"noone\" (username), \"work related dig regarding separation of definitions and implementations\", in comp.lang.c++, Usenet",
          "text": "Next, TTBOMK you need to do your classes in header files if you are going to make them into generic templates...well, putting them into headers isn't strictly a requirement but the other restrictions for (templatizable code) would encourage only using headers."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Able to be templatized."
      ],
      "id": "en-templatizable-en-adj-EfEJt9V8",
      "links": [
        [
          "computing",
          "computing#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "templatize",
          "templatize"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(computing, rare) Able to be templatized."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable",
        "rare"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "computing",
        "engineering",
        "mathematics",
        "natural-sciences",
        "physical-sciences",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "templatizable"
}
{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "templatize",
        "3": "able"
      },
      "expansion": "templatize + -able",
      "name": "suffix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From templatize + -able.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "templatizable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms suffixed with -able",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English terms with rare senses",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "en:Computing"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1998 September 21, John Potter, \"Re: operator+(C c1, const C& c2)\", in comp.lang.c++.moderated, Usenet",
          "text": "They are equally templatizable and inlinable."
        },
        {
          "ref": "2006 August 22, The Ghost In The Machine, “Re: Java FACT ?”, in comp.lang.java.advocacy (Usenet)",
          "text": "Closures would be reassignable and templatizable, and of course used as values, leading to some ugly syntax without typedefs, but one could contemplate something along the following lines: […]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2006 December 17, \"The Ghost In The Machine\" (username), \"Re: Goto's labels makes code _Tons_ more readable ( and lest nested ).\", in sci.physics and alt.usenet.kooks, Usenet",
          "text": "One can also split the problem into pieces, which gets kind of ugly in C, but might be templatizable in C++: […]"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2007 January 22, \"noone\" (username), \"work related dig regarding separation of definitions and implementations\", in comp.lang.c++, Usenet",
          "text": "Next, TTBOMK you need to do your classes in header files if you are going to make them into generic templates...well, putting them into headers isn't strictly a requirement but the other restrictions for (templatizable code) would encourage only using headers."
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Able to be templatized."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "computing",
          "computing#Noun"
        ],
        [
          "templatize",
          "templatize"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(computing, rare) Able to be templatized."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable",
        "rare"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "computing",
        "engineering",
        "mathematics",
        "natural-sciences",
        "physical-sciences",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "templatizable"
}

Download raw JSONL data for templatizable meaning in All languages combined (2.2kB)


This page is a part of the kaikki.org machine-readable All languages combined dictionary. This dictionary is based on structured data extracted on 2024-09-01 from the enwiktionary dump dated 2024-08-20 using wiktextract (8e41825 and f99c758). The data shown on this site has been post-processed and various details (e.g., extra categories) removed, some information disambiguated, and additional data merged from other sources. See the raw data download page for the unprocessed wiktextract data.

If you use this data in academic research, please cite Tatu Ylonen: Wiktextract: Wiktionary as Machine-Readable Structured Data, Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1317-1325, Marseille, 20-25 June 2022. Linking to the relevant page(s) under https://kaikki.org would also be greatly appreciated.