"prerevision" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "pre",
        "3": "revision"
      },
      "expansion": "pre- + revision",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From pre- + revision.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "prerevision (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with pre-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2016 March 2, “Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements – The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis”, in PLOS ONE, →DOI:",
          "text": "If prerevision details that included metal ion levels and/or imaging findings were described in single patients in the results section, the use of screening was considered lacking unless there was a protocol rationale in methods section that described the use of these screening methods, i.e., patients with a complaint underwent an MRI scan.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Prior to revision"
      ],
      "id": "en-prerevision-en-adj-~ZS88Nac",
      "links": [
        [
          "revision",
          "revision"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "prerevision"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "pre",
        "3": "revision"
      },
      "expansion": "pre- + revision",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From pre- + revision.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "prerevision (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with pre-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2016 March 2, “Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements – The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis”, in PLOS ONE, →DOI:",
          "text": "If prerevision details that included metal ion levels and/or imaging findings were described in single patients in the results section, the use of screening was considered lacking unless there was a protocol rationale in methods section that described the use of these screening methods, i.e., patients with a complaint underwent an MRI scan.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Prior to revision"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "revision",
          "revision"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "prerevision"
}