"nonverbalness" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "nonverbal",
        "3": "-ness"
      },
      "expansion": "nonverbal + -ness",
      "name": "affix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From nonverbal + -ness.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nonverbalness (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms suffixed with -ness",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1987 March, David F. Armstrong, “Word, Sign And Object”, in Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, volume 77, number 1, →JSTOR, page 28:",
          "text": "Fundamental iconism in signs has, historically, been taken as indicative of primitiveness or “nonverbalness,” and it was the seminal discovery of Stokoe²² that this iconism in American Sign Language masked a more basic structure that, indeed, had a phonological type of organization.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The quality of being nonverbal."
      ],
      "id": "en-nonverbalness-en-noun-1U6bQNeH",
      "links": [
        [
          "nonverbal",
          "nonverbal"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nonverbalness"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "nonverbal",
        "3": "-ness"
      },
      "expansion": "nonverbal + -ness",
      "name": "affix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From nonverbal + -ness.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nonverbalness (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms suffixed with -ness",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1987 March, David F. Armstrong, “Word, Sign And Object”, in Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, volume 77, number 1, →JSTOR, page 28:",
          "text": "Fundamental iconism in signs has, historically, been taken as indicative of primitiveness or “nonverbalness,” and it was the seminal discovery of Stokoe²² that this iconism in American Sign Language masked a more basic structure that, indeed, had a phonological type of organization.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "The quality of being nonverbal."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "nonverbal",
          "nonverbal"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "uncountable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nonverbalness"
}