"nonignorable" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "non-",
        "3": "ignorable"
      },
      "expansion": "non- + ignorable",
      "name": "pre"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From non- + ignorable.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nonignorable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with non-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2015, Wang Miao, Peng Ding, Zhi Geng, “Identifiability of Normal and Normal Mixture Models With Nonignorable Missing Data”, in arXiv:",
          "text": "Although it is fundamental for valid statistical inference, identifiability under nonignorable missing mechanisms is not established for many commonly-used models.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2023 July 12, Andrew Fischer, “Polls Were Great in 2022. Can They Repeat Their Success in 2024?”, in The New York Times, New York, N.Y.: The New York Times Company, →ISSN, →OCLC, archived from the original on 2023-07-23:",
          "text": "\"It's a brute force method,\" said Clifford Young, the president of U.S. public affairs at Ipsos. \"That is, we don't really know what it corrects for. Does it correct for only nonignorable nonresponse? Or does it correct for coverage bias? Or maybe a likely voter problem? Maybe all three.\"",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not ignorable."
      ],
      "id": "en-nonignorable-en-adj-JC0i1kUE",
      "links": [
        [
          "ignorable",
          "ignorable#Adjective"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nonignorable"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "non-",
        "3": "ignorable"
      },
      "expansion": "non- + ignorable",
      "name": "pre"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From non- + ignorable.",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "nonignorable (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with non-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2015, Wang Miao, Peng Ding, Zhi Geng, “Identifiability of Normal and Normal Mixture Models With Nonignorable Missing Data”, in arXiv:",
          "text": "Although it is fundamental for valid statistical inference, identifiability under nonignorable missing mechanisms is not established for many commonly-used models.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2023 July 12, Andrew Fischer, “Polls Were Great in 2022. Can They Repeat Their Success in 2024?”, in The New York Times, New York, N.Y.: The New York Times Company, →ISSN, →OCLC, archived from the original on 2023-07-23:",
          "text": "\"It's a brute force method,\" said Clifford Young, the president of U.S. public affairs at Ipsos. \"That is, we don't really know what it corrects for. Does it correct for only nonignorable nonresponse? Or does it correct for coverage bias? Or maybe a likely voter problem? Maybe all three.\"",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Not ignorable."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "ignorable",
          "ignorable#Adjective"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "nonignorable"
}