"natural wastage" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "antonyms": [
    {
      "word": "redundancy"
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "natural wastage (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "British English",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Business",
          "orig": "en:Business",
          "parents": [
            "Economics",
            "Society",
            "Social sciences",
            "All topics",
            "Sciences",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1962 October, “Talking of Trains: B.R. works staff cut by a third”, in Modern Railways, page 221",
          "text": "Of the total labour force now threatened with redundancy, of course, a proportion will be covered by natural wastage, so that the number eventually thrown out of railway work will be well below 19,000.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2023 March 22, Mike Esbester, “Staff, the public and industry will suffer”, in RAIL, number 979, page 39",
          "text": "From just over 476,500 employees in 1962, by 1973 the total was just over 250,000. Much of this was achieved via 'natural wastage' - controlling recruitment closely and not replacing staff as they retired.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Decrease of workforce caused by non-replacement of retiring or voluntarily resigning employees and not by deliberate layoffs."
      ],
      "id": "en-natural_wastage-en-noun-LGel738c",
      "links": [
        [
          "business",
          "business"
        ],
        [
          "workforce",
          "workforce"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(British, business) Decrease of workforce caused by non-replacement of retiring or voluntarily resigning employees and not by deliberate layoffs."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "attrition"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "British",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "business"
      ],
      "translations": [
        {
          "code": "fi",
          "lang": "Finnish",
          "sense": "natural workforce attrition",
          "word": "luonnollinen poistuma"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "natural wastage"
}

{
  "antonyms": [
    {
      "word": "redundancy"
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "natural wastage (uncountable)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "British English",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Requests for review of Russian translations",
        "en:Business"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1962 October, “Talking of Trains: B.R. works staff cut by a third”, in Modern Railways, page 221",
          "text": "Of the total labour force now threatened with redundancy, of course, a proportion will be covered by natural wastage, so that the number eventually thrown out of railway work will be well below 19,000.",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2023 March 22, Mike Esbester, “Staff, the public and industry will suffer”, in RAIL, number 979, page 39",
          "text": "From just over 476,500 employees in 1962, by 1973 the total was just over 250,000. Much of this was achieved via 'natural wastage' - controlling recruitment closely and not replacing staff as they retired.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Decrease of workforce caused by non-replacement of retiring or voluntarily resigning employees and not by deliberate layoffs."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "business",
          "business"
        ],
        [
          "workforce",
          "workforce"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(British, business) Decrease of workforce caused by non-replacement of retiring or voluntarily resigning employees and not by deliberate layoffs."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "British",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "business"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "attrition"
    }
  ],
  "translations": [
    {
      "code": "fi",
      "lang": "Finnish",
      "sense": "natural workforce attrition",
      "word": "luonnollinen poistuma"
    }
  ],
  "word": "natural wastage"
}