"monostratal" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "mono",
        "3": "stratal"
      },
      "expansion": "mono- + stratal",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "mono- + stratal",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "monostratal (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with mono-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1972, David G. Lockwood, Introduction to Stratificational Linguistics, page 232",
          "text": "[…]a difference of 18 in favor of the monostratal version. To date this model has yet to see any extensive degree of application, but it seems that there[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2009, William D. Lewis with Simin Karimi and Heidi Harley, Time and again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics in honor of D. Terrence Langendoen, page 220",
          "text": "First, it is a monostratal model that does not require transduction. Hence it enjoys the full restrictiveness of finite state automata over transducers.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "composed of or organized as a single stratum."
      ],
      "id": "en-monostratal-en-adj-5KCX4cFr",
      "links": [
        [
          "compose",
          "compose"
        ],
        [
          "organize",
          "organize"
        ],
        [
          "stratum",
          "stratum"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "monostratal"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "mono",
        "3": "stratal"
      },
      "expansion": "mono- + stratal",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "mono- + stratal",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "monostratal (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with mono-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1972, David G. Lockwood, Introduction to Stratificational Linguistics, page 232",
          "text": "[…]a difference of 18 in favor of the monostratal version. To date this model has yet to see any extensive degree of application, but it seems that there[…]",
          "type": "quotation"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2009, William D. Lewis with Simin Karimi and Heidi Harley, Time and again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics in honor of D. Terrence Langendoen, page 220",
          "text": "First, it is a monostratal model that does not require transduction. Hence it enjoys the full restrictiveness of finite state automata over transducers.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "composed of or organized as a single stratum."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "compose",
          "compose"
        ],
        [
          "organize",
          "organize"
        ],
        [
          "stratum",
          "stratum"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "monostratal"
}