"macrobotanical" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "macro",
        "3": "botanical"
      },
      "expansion": "macro- + botanical",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "macro- + botanical",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "macrobotanical (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with macro-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2016 February 4, “Macro-Process of Past Plant Subsistence from the Upper Paleolithic to Middle Neolithic in China: A Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Archaeobotanical Data”, in PLOS ONE, →DOI",
          "text": "Within these data, there were a total of 18,791 plant macro-remains in which 3,856 cereals (rice, millets, etc.) were identified, then the proportion of cereals in macrobotanical remains was 21% (3,856/18,791×100%) during 9~6 ka cal BP. There were 15 sites in which macro-remains or starch grains of common millet were found; Cishan, Tanghu, and Xihe sites had macro-botanical and/or starch data without common millet, which was found in phytolith data of each site.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Related to macroplants"
      ],
      "id": "en-macrobotanical-en-adj-VRmEljxS",
      "links": [
        [
          "macroplant",
          "macroplant"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "macrobotanical"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "macro",
        "3": "botanical"
      },
      "expansion": "macro- + botanical",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "macro- + botanical",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-"
      },
      "expansion": "macrobotanical (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English terms prefixed with macro-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "2016 February 4, “Macro-Process of Past Plant Subsistence from the Upper Paleolithic to Middle Neolithic in China: A Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Archaeobotanical Data”, in PLOS ONE, →DOI",
          "text": "Within these data, there were a total of 18,791 plant macro-remains in which 3,856 cereals (rice, millets, etc.) were identified, then the proportion of cereals in macrobotanical remains was 21% (3,856/18,791×100%) during 9~6 ka cal BP. There were 15 sites in which macro-remains or starch grains of common millet were found; Cishan, Tanghu, and Xihe sites had macro-botanical and/or starch data without common millet, which was found in phytolith data of each site.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Related to macroplants"
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "macroplant",
          "macroplant"
        ]
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "macrobotanical"
}